[ad_1]
Financial and Monetary Crimes Fee (EFCC) has described as false stories that the N400 million cash laundering case in opposition to former Nationwide Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Social gathering (PDP), Olisa Metuh had been struck out.
The fee maintained that there is no such thing as a pending case earlier than the Federal Excessive Court docket to warrant placing out of the identical case.
A report on Monday had {that a} Federal Excessive Court docket (FHC), Abuja, struck out the go well with filed by the EFCC in opposition to Metuh, for retrial.
Justice Emeka Nwite, in a ruling, described the seven-count felony cost in a go well with marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/05/2022 filed by the EFCC, as “an abuse of courtroom course of
However the spokesperson of the EFCC, Wilson Uwujaren in an announcement, insisted that there is no such thing as a modicum of fact in these stories.
He mentioned: “Metuh’s case is presently pending earlier than the Supreme Court docket, arising from the attraction by the Fee, in addition to his personal cross-appeal, upon the judgement of the Court docket of Attraction which nullified the judgement of the trial courtroom on alleged grounds of bias.
“There’s, due to this fact, no pending case earlier than the Federal Excessive Court docket to warrant placing out of the identical.
“It bears reiterating that the EFCC, has no contemporary utility for retrial of Metuh earlier than the courtroom.
“There could be no placing out of a go well with that was not initiated or filed earlier than the courtroom. Any report of placing out of a go well with filed by the EFCC on Metuh is a gross misrepresentation of the standing of the case and the general public is enjoined to disregard such stories.
“The EFCC is awaiting the judgement of the apex courtroom, in opposition to the discharge of Metuh, by the Court docket of Attraction, within the N400 million cash laundering costs instituted in opposition to him.
“The Fee will do nothing to abuse processes of the courtroom, because it stays dedicated to complete respect for the rule of legislation.”
[ad_2]
Source link
