MSNBC Visitor Reveals Liberal Coping Mechanisms For Having To Share a Nation With Conservatives

, I feel I converse for all Individuals no matter political affiliation once I say that I’ve missed former White Home Press Secretary Jen Psaki. Whereas I disagreed with in all probability 99% of what she would say on the podium, she was at the very least faster on her ft than her protege. Nevertheless, Karine Jean-Pierre has supplied numerous content material for my articles, so I thank her.

I’ve been interested in how Jen’s been doing at her new residence at MSNBC, and proper on cue, i noticed her on a panel interview with The Brookings Establishment’s senior fellow Shadi Hamid.

There to advertise an upcoming occasion on the liberal-leaning assume tank, he mentioned how liberals may cope in a world with those that disagree with them.

Apparently, we dwell in a world the place folks should be reminded that they have to study to proceed on when there are these roaming this Earth with completely different views than you. However alas, right here we’re.

Simply take a watch, and also you’ll get an unvarnished glimpse of what the left thinks of their fellow countrymen:

Brookings’ ⁦@shadihamid⁩: “There’s, what, 74 million Trump supporters, voters? We will’t simply want them away … So then now we have to discover a approach to dwell with them even when we predict they’re dangerous folks, even when we predict they’re a risk to every little thing we maintain expensive.” pic.twitter.com/ilvpgasWDc

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 14, 2022

Oh Please

Good previous Jen Psaki introduced up the prospect that we would find yourself having to place up with yet one more time period with Donald Trump or somebody like him in workplace, trembling to assume what sort of a world that may be like! So anyway, she requested Mr. Hamid:

“What classes ought to Individuals take from what has occurred around the globe if there are extentive years of a authorities in place whose combating in opposition to democracy and combating in opposition to elementary rights.”

Oh brother. Mr. Hamid obliges her overly dramatic query, supporting the validity of it by invoking the latest election in Italy of the dreaded Giorgia Meloni, typically in comparison with Benito Mussolini, stating slightly precisely that:

“…that individual could have come to energy via elections.”

That is meant to be nicer to Trump supporters, however it’s nonetheless a man named Shadi Hamid treating Trump voters as interlopers that the “actual Individuals” simply need to tolerate. https://t.co/8YY9W4gFyq

— Scott Greer 6’2” IQ 187 (@ScottMGreer) October 14, 2022

What?! Say it isn’t so? So the folks’s will in a good election would possibly decide to vote for a conservative politician in a free nation? Whoa, whoa, whoa, we must always examine this additional.

RELATED: The Left Used To Help Radical Free Speech. Now They Abhor It. What Occurred?

Embrace Acceptance

Now if I’m going to be sincere, I agree with the basics of what Mr. Hamid says subsequent. He rightly and gently explains to the MSNBC pundits:

“We’ve got to simply accept that individuals that we fully disagree with are typically going to win.”

He goes on to kick them within the intestine with the next:

“There’s, what, 74 million Trump supporters, voters? We will’t simply want them away…so then now we have to discover a approach to dwell with them even when we predict they’re dangerous folks, even when we predict they’re a risk to every little thing we maintain expensive.”

You possibly can actually hear the dismay from Jen and the others when he stated that. Critically I’ve watched the clip about seven instances; you possibly can hear it.

And right here is the place Mr. Hamid brings up a chilling query and one which I feel some on the left would reply in a really darkish type of means:

“What’s the opposite choice that’s in entrance of us?”

What, certainly.

We’re not far proper. We’re populist/nationalists who reject socialism, communism & Marxism. We consider in restricted authorities, particular person freedoms, household, religion & capitalism.

— Donine (@ms_fiberlicious) October 14, 2022

RELATED: MSNBC Host Nicolle Wallace Needs Obama-led ‘Democracy Fee’ To Save America From Republicans

Problematic Democracy?

Mr. Hamid is internet hosting an occasion subsequent week at The Brookings Establishment titled ‘The Drawback with Democracy: Islam, Liberalism, and American Overseas Coverage.’ Throughout this dialogue subsequent week, Mr. Hamid will talk about his idea of ‘Democratic Minimalism.’

On the Brookings web site, ‘Democratic Minimalism’ is described as:

“decoupling Democracy and Liberalism when the 2 are in rigidity.”

Clear as mud? I believed so. You’re in luck, although, as a result of I’m a political science and principle nerd, so I’ll break down what this argument is all about.

To grasp democratic minimalism, you first need to go over different ideas like democratic liberalism and liberalism on the whole. Liberalism might be not what you assume it’s; it’s not only a bunch of dudes strolling round with man buns and girls sporting hats formed like feminine genitalia protesting this or that.

Liberalism is the idea that particular person rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise needs to be promoted and that the distinction of opinions is one thing to be revered and results in new concepts. Right now we name it “classical liberalism” to indicate this ideology, most famously promoted by luminaries like Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, and others. 

It’s not American “liberalism,” as outlined by the Democrat Get together.

So let’s add democratic governance to that dangerous boy and see what we get.

This is without doubt one of the key arguments I make in my new ebook. We’ve got to learn to respect democratic outcomes even when we understand them as a risk to every little thing we maintain expensive. That is the check.https://t.co/vgitXQV7ob pic.twitter.com/QcliYpolWo

— Shadi Hamid (@shadihamid) October 14, 2022

RELATED: MSNBC’s Pleasure Reid Compares Floridians Evacuating Hurricane Ian to Unlawful Immigrants: ‘Ironic That They Should Pour Over the Borders and Go North’

Evaluating Democracies

Democratic liberalism continues to be in all probability not what you assume; there aren’t any man buns right here, properly, perhaps just a few man buns. Democratic liberalism is the concept the folks have energy and are lively individuals within the governance of their nation, inside the classical liberal framework of values.

So what’s democratic minimalism? It would sound interesting for somebody like me who lives a minimalist life-style, however it’s actually not, though you possibly can examine it.

My husband and I wish to dwell fairly small; we favor to spend our cash on experiences versus issues, and in comparison with different households, we personal little or no. Democratic minimalism strips democracy right down to its naked bones, protecting it to guaranteeing elections… and that’s it.

I haven’t obtained my invitation to Mr. Hamid’s occasion but; it should nonetheless be within the mail, however from what I can collect, Mr. Hamid would argue that when a society is experiencing some political strife, the protections of liberalism needs to be eliminated. A spotlight solely on free elections and that’s all needs to be instituted.

Sounds ridiculous? It’s as a result of you possibly can’t have free elections with out all that different pesky civil liberty stuff.

“MAGA Republicans characterize an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.” -Joe Biden September 1, 2022. https://t.co/Gc1Ovc4loU

— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 14, 2022

RELATED: 37 Years And seven Excursions In The Army, And All We Get Is Our President Calling Us Extremist Fascists?

The Actual Drawback Isn’t Democracy

The issue that now we have isn’t our type of democracy; the issue now we have is that now we have misplaced the flexibility to tolerate each other and to carry sure truths sacred. Individuals like these on MSNBC are terrified of individuals like Ms. Meloni in Italy as a result of she believes that individuals shouldn’t need to apologize for his or her identification, together with conservatives.

I’m a girl, a mom, I consider in God, I like my nation, I’m a veteran, a Republican, I’m white, and I shouldn’t need to apologize for it or cover any of it. Nevertheless, I additionally shouldn’t be judged as both good or dangerous solely based mostly on these features of my identification.

Whereas Mr. Hamid made some wonderful factors, I’ve to take problem together with his concept that democratic minimalism is a practical reply to what ails us. As an alternative, I’d argue that we have to cease labeling one another as evil or fascists and study to have constructive debates.

However which social gathering is it once more, Jen, that calls their opponents evil and fascists? I’m unsure I keep in mind; perhaps you possibly can remind me. Or maybe I ought to ask Ms. Jean-Pierre.

After defending calling Republicans “semi-fascists,” and “MAGA extremists,” Karine Jean-Pierre says “this isn’t about one political social gathering.” pic.twitter.com/4KYKmB4fs3

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 1, 2022