[ad_1]
All the 40 feedback up to now failed to notice that that is an article written in French.
Not that you actually need to learn it, you will get the gist of what it may include from the headline. It isn’t going to be information, fascinating, or true. It is all “consultants say”, “could also be”, “X reveals that Y” when X and Y are two fully unconnected concepts, solely linked by the article itself, or somebody’s opinion.
They point out 831 examples of violent or terroristic content material on 34 platforms. What? That is a sentence meant to spook you, offering zero context, no definition of what their phrases imply, no comparisons. Simply go on /pol/ and you will find 1000 within the first minute. They know you’ll be able to freely share textual content or video recordsdata on the web, and this occurs at charges of billions to trillions of occasions per day, proper?
Aside from that, a minimum of two terrorist assaults occurred and are talked about, earlier than nineteenth of December, when the article was posted. That is it, that is the information.
[ad_2]
Source link