[ad_1]
A former member of the Home of Representatives, Chuma Nzeribe has been convicted of possession of false paperwork, impersonation and dishonest.
Justice Yusuf Halilu of the Excessive Court docket of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on Monday discovered him responsible of a four-count cost proffered in opposition to him by the Federal Authorities.
The FG accused Mr Nzeribe of being in possession of Federal Authorities paperwork of which he used to fraudulently purchase land at Maitama District of Abuja.
Again story
Mr Nzeribe, who was absent in courtroom at the moment, allegedly dedicated the offences in 2005, 2007 and 2013.
- In 2013, the alleged defendant had a doc in his possession which contained false pretence with reference quantity MFCT/LA/FCT 1302, dated June 18, 2003, bearing the title of Ramatu Alhassan and thereby dedicated an offence opposite to Part 6, 8(b) of the Advance Price Fraud and Different Fraud Associated Offences Act, 2006 and punishable below Part 1 (3) of the identical Act.
- He was accused of utilizing the alleged doc as real, thereby committing an offence opposite to Part 366 of the Penal Code Act Cap 532 Legal guidelines of the Federation of Nigeria (Abuja) and punishable below Part 364 of the identical Act.
- When he was first arraigned, he pleaded not responsible to the fees in opposition to him.
What occurred in courtroom
- When the matter was referred to as up at the moment, A. A. Maryam the prosecuting counsel prayed the courtroom to ship judgement in step with the availability of the Administration of Felony Justice Act (ACJA), 2015.
- She advised the courtroom that it was the selection of the defendant to be absent in courtroom regardless of being served with a listening to discover.
- Ms Maryam additionally sought the courtroom to make an order in opposition to the defendant for misconduct as he was absent on the final adjourned date.
- Nzeribe’s Counsel opposed the prayer of the prosecution, he argued that judgement can’t be delivered within the absence of the defendant as stipulated by legislation.
- Delivering judgement, Justice Halilu held that the prosecution was capable of show its case in opposition to Nzeribe past any cheap doubt. Consequently, the decide convicted him on all of the four-count fees.
- He held that the convict certainly made false pretence and is responsible of forgery and utilizing identical to be real.
Nonetheless, following his absence, the decide deferred the sentencing of the convict to a time that both the Inspector-Normal of Police or the EFCC arrest Nzeribe and introduced him to courtroom to be sentenced appropriately.
The decide additionally ordered that land in Maitama acquired with the cast paperwork be instantly retrieved by its authentic proprietor Mr Ishaya Madi.
Associated
[ad_2]
Source link