[ad_1]
My fishing pal Sam Rines has spent a lot of this yr pushing a thesis of “Value over Quantity”; I discovered it a compelling narrative, one that matches in properly with an apsect of inflation that I had initially underestimated: “Greedflation.”
The Value over Quantity thesis is each compelling and underappreciated. I hope you discover his take thought upsetting… -Barry
Value over Quantity stays a key theme this earnings season with PG’s earnings report the tip of the iceberg. As a reminder, this has been one in all PolyMacro’s themes for the previous yr.
It stays early within the present earnings season. However the persistence of the PoV narrative is changing into virtually comical. The quantity of value flowing via the system to shoppers is fairly obscene. Pushing 10% value at P&G with comparatively little pushback on volumes (-3%??) makes for a troublesome argument that there’s a disincentive to proceed discovering that elasticity breaking level. And P&G doesn’t seem to have discovered it but.
And the present S&P International PMI numbers serve to bolster the PoV narrative. Manufacturing corporations? Pushing value. Providers corporations? Pushing value.
And taking all of it collectively – the uptick in demand is inflicting pricing pressures to re-emerge that can’t be ignored. If the S&P PMI report proves to be appropriate (inflation reaccelerating) that’s going to be extremely problematic for danger belongings which have change into extra snug with a “hike to pause” narrative.
Corporations are saying costs are going greater, and the surveys are confirming it. It must also not be ignored that this survey is following the banking scare.
While you mix the narrative from P&G (“we’ve got value energy and we all know it now”) with the FOMC’s best concern (providers inflation), it isn’t troublesome to parse out what occurs subsequent. There may be little in the best way of aid coming within the pipeline for the buyer.
This isn’t the identical economic system because the pre-Covid period. That is the economic system of “pushing value” and discovering that marginal greenback.
There was – was – a rational argument for a much less aggressive PoV coming via the system. Following the SIVB debacle and the next funding pressures seen by some regional banks, the steadiness of the monetary sector was in danger. That was purported to be a headwind to the US economic system and inflationary pressures.
However because it seems that’s merely not what is going on.
There’s a sense that the banking scare solved the inflation downside. And – whereas there are theoretical causes to imagine it to be the case – it has not confirmed to be true to date in earnings. United Airways referred to as it out as a “two week” headwind, and there have been scarce others that face shoppers even acknowledging it.
And Pepsi – the one firm that was not supposed to have the ability to increase costs due to the direct competitors from KO – is among the most evident PoV culprits.
The acceleration in pricing throughout – however notably at Pepsi and the like – is astonishing. It’s indicative of the present company mentality. There are only a few probabilities to seek out the elasticity of demand. And – in the intervening time – there are ample excuses to determine it out.
There’s a battle. There’s a labor scarcity. These are good excuses to boost pricing and never care about quantity. And that’s the world we live in. Quantity doesn’t matter. Value does.
~~~
Samuel Rines is the managing director at Corbu, Samuel Rines is an analyst of all issues financial with a concentrate on how “the micro meets the the macro”. Sam is the creator of “After Regular” and writes continuously on the cross-section of the economic system and markets.
Samuel Rines | Managing Director
CORBŪ
samuel.rines@corbu.co
[ad_2]
Source link