[ad_1]
Kiran Sharma and James Hand-Cukierman of Nikkei Asia stories on the assembly between President Zelensky and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the G7.
Modi’s workplace tweeted photos of the encounter, certainly one of which confirmed the 2 leaders shaking fingers. One other confirmed them locked in what gave the impression to be an intense dialogue over a convention desk, flanked by aides.
A message posted on Zelenskyy’s Twitter account mentioned the Ukrainian chief briefed Modi on Kyiv’s peace system and invited India to “be part of its implementation.” Zelenskyy expressed gratitude to India for supporting Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, and for humanitarian help.
The peace system Ukraine outlined final yr requires nuclear, vitality and meals safety, restoration of borders and different factors.
India’s Ministry of Exterior Affairs mentioned Modi conveyed to Zelenskyy “India’s clear assist for dialogue and diplomacy to discover a method ahead.” Modi mentioned that for him, the battle “isn’t a political or financial problem however a problem of humanity, of human values.” They agreed to stay in contact.
Notably, President Zelensky did not meet with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva though it appears that evidently Lula met and took photographs with each different chief on the G7. If Lula actually desires to be a a part of negotiating a peaceable settlement to the Russia-Ukraine struggle, the least he might have accomplished is met with Zelensky whereas the each of them have been in Hiroshima (which he might have, for all we know).
Howard LaFranchi of Christian Science Monitor factors out that U.S. President Joe Biden is pursuing a few different pillars of his international coverage however the debt ceiling disaster could also be getting in the best way.
…Mr. Biden, past his short-term coverage agenda, can also be pursuing two key pillars of his presidency’s international coverage: revitalizing America’s alliances and demonstrating democracy’s virtues as an efficient governing system in an period of advancing authoritarianism.
Hanging over each priorities is the debt ceiling disaster Mr. Biden left behind in Washington – and the way that unresolved home problem pressured the White Home to cancel the second half of what was to have been a weeklong journey showcasing the U.S. dedication to the Asia-Pacific area.
Canceled have been post-G-7 visits to Australia and the Pacific island nation of Papua New Guinea – the latter proudly touted by the White Home as the primary go to by a sitting president to a South Pacific island nation.
Gone, a deliberate summit in Sydney of leaders from the Quad nations: the U.S., Australia, India, and Japan. Nixed, a gathering of Pacific Island leaders in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea’s capital, and a presidential announcement of an settlement to grant the U.S. navy entry to the island nation’s ports and airports.
Overseas coverage is home coverage as effectively and the Republicans will do something to embarrass President Biden, even to our allies.
Lydia DePillis and Ben Casselmen of The New York Occasions say that at this juncture, the debt ceiling debate can have a foul affect on the American economic system.
Even when a deal is struck earlier than the final minute, the lengthy uncertainty might drive up borrowing prices and additional destabilize already shaky monetary markets. It might result in a pullback in funding and hiring by companies when the U.S. economic system is already going through elevated dangers of a recession, and hamstring the financing of public works tasks.
Extra broadly, the standoff might diminish long-term confidence within the stability of the U.S. monetary system, with lasting repercussions.
Presently, traders are displaying few indicators of alarm. Though markets fell on Friday after Republican leaders in Congress declared a “pause” on negotiations, the declines have been modest, suggesting that merchants are betting that the events will come to an settlement in the long run — as they at all times have earlier than.
Geoffrey Skelley and Mary Radcliffe of FiveThirtyEight study Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s conservative bonafides.
For the second-term governor, swinging for the fences has been a higher-stakes proposition: DeSantis is broadly anticipated to announce a marketing campaign for president within the coming days. He’ll enter the race with a legislative document that appears fairly completely different than it did a yr in the past. Since gaveling into session in March, the Florida legislature has moved rapidly on DeSantis’s priorities, passing payments on subjects starting from faculty vouchers to gun management to tort reform. So, earlier than his four-country worldwide “commerce mission,” earlier than his jaunt as much as Washington, D.C., to rally assist among the many Florida congressional delegation and earlier than his go to to Iowa for a weekend of meet-and-greets, DeSantis spent weeks in Tallahassee signing his agenda into legislation.
However the extent to which DeSantis’s agenda has actually been “groundbreaking and nation-leading” is much less clear. FiveThirtyEight dug into the state’s current legislative modifications and in contrast a pattern of its new legal guidelines to these of different GOP-dominated states. This isn’t an effort to guage the affect of Florida’s current spate of laws; it’s merely an examination of when that laws handed relative to comparable legal guidelines in fellow pink states enacting Republican priorities. We discovered that, in some areas, Florida is certainly main the pack. For instance, DeSantis and his allies have been on the forefront of implementing conservative education-related and anti-LGBTQ insurance policies, whilst polls have recommended a few of these insurance policies might have restricted enchantment. However with regards to different conservative priorities, like gun coverage and abortion, Florida Republicans have largely moved with — and even lagged behind — a bigger group of pink states.
DeSatan as the “affordable” conservative different is just ridiculous. Good strive, although.
Moreover, ABC employed occasional Nate Silver nemesis G. Elliot Morris to be FiveThirtyEight’s new editorial director of information analytics for the information division.
Rachel Roubein, Caroline Kitchener, and Colby Itkowitz of The Washington Publish report that an growing Republicans now seem to want abortion bans after 12 weeks for political functions.
Instantly after the Supreme Courtroom overturned Roe v. Wade, Republican lawmakers have been fast to embrace so-called “set off” bans designed to take impact as quickly as the choice was launched, whereas others rushed to cross extra restrictions that may halt the process of their states, generally backing proposals that didn’t embody exceptions for rape or incest.
Now, nearly a yr later, lawmakers in some Republican-led states have began coalescing behind bans that permit most abortions to proceed — a response, some Republicans say, to the sustained political backlash to abortion restrictions that has been mounting because the landmark determination in June.
Whereas the 12-week bans have up to now solely handed in two states — North Carolina and Nebraska — the proposal has additionally gained traction with some nationwide antiabortion teams who say they’re supportive of limiting abortions so far as a state can, together with Susan B. Anthony Professional-Life America, which has additionally been pushing for, at minimal, nationwide limits on abortion at 15 weeks.
Henry Grabar of Slate wonders if GOP insurance policies will deliver Southern migration to a halt.
And but the mouse startling the elephant touches on a a lot bigger query: How far can Republican governors go earlier than companies and their workers start to rethink a red-state migration that has been the dominant American geographic sample of current a long time? In February, DeSantis wrote an op-ed within the Wall Road Journal arguing that standing as much as Disney was simply half of a bigger effort to rein in company America’s supposed left-wing politics. “We’re making Florida the state the place the economic system prospers,” he wrote, “as a result of we’re the state the place woke goes to die.” At what level do business-friendly insurance policies on air pollution, taxation, and employee safety get outweighed by social-justice issues within the boardroom?
[…]
And but it’s additionally true that pink states have continued to hoover up jobs and inhabitants, with Florida’s whole employment surpassing New York’s for the primary time in 2022. Simply as pink states provide a sexy bundle for bosses, they’ve begun to lure educated staff for largely separate causes: heat climate and low cost houses. This development appears to have accelerated because the pandemic, as distant work loosens the hyperlink between geography and high-paying careers.
Cities like New York, Washington, and San Francisco are shedding school graduates, who’re flocking to main Southern cities like Dallas, Houston, Austin, Atlanta, Nashville, Orlando, and Jacksonville. But whilst cities develop extra just like each other, promising comparable inclusive cultures, revitalized walkable neighborhoods, and international eating scenes, they’re diverging politically as pink states undertake ever-more-reactionary insurance policies.
What’s former British Prime Minister Liz Truss doing in Taiwan?
Martin Boyle/The Diplomat
Liz Truss – the short-lived Conservative prime minister who tanked the U.Okay. economic system in a matter of days and was unceremoniously sacked – visited Taiwan this week on the invitation of the independence-leaning assume tank, the Prospect Basis. On Wednesday, she delivered a speech entitled “Taiwan: On the Frontline of Freedom and Democracy.”
The journey exhibits the readiness of some Western politicians to make use of Taiwan as a stick with beat China with. Such visits diminish public understanding of Taiwan’s contested political standing. They danger coming throughout as circus acts by upstaging unofficial diplomacy. They obscure the official Taiwan coverage of Western powers. In legitimizing Taiwan’s sovereignty, such visits affect broader elite attitudes within the West.
The response from Beijing has been dismissive. In an interview with the BBC, Chinese language Communist Celebration (CCP) spokesperson Victor Gao scorned the concept that Truss might provoke a present of Chinese language power just like the one seen after then-U.S. Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s go to. “I feel she isn’t impactful or consequential in any respect by any stretch of the creativeness,” was his scathing evaluation.
Lastly at present, The Grammarian writes for The Philadelphia Inquirer that phrases shouldn’t be banned by anybody.
Just some weeks in the past, a lawmaker from Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s far-right Brothers of Italy celebration launched a invoice that may outlaw using non-Italian phrases — largely English — from official authorities communications. “It isn’t only a matter of vogue, as fashions cross, however Anglomania [has] repercussions for society as a complete,” learn draft textual content of the laws. (However not in English, clearly.)
It’s taking place elsewhere, too. Final yr, Quebec handed a legislation requiring new immigrants to make use of solely French — not English — of their interactions with the federal government inside six months of arrival.
The Italian invoice consists of some laudable objectives; for instance, it requires officeholders to have “written and oral information and mastery of the Italian language,” a mandate whose English-language counterpart would disqualify any variety of American politicians and dwelling former presidents.
However such a legislation can also be foolish, not least as a result of each language inherits and adapts phrases from different languages. In truth, extra so than every other language, English owes its existence to phrases borrowed from others.
Have the very best day, everybody!
[ad_2]
Source link