[ad_1]
Embattled former Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, on Thursday advised Justice Inyang Ekwo of a Federal Excessive Court docket in Abuja that the Financial and Monetary Crimes Fee was chargeable for his travails on the London Court docket the place he had been in detention over alleged organ harvest.
The Senator who has been in custody in London over an alleged organ harvest advised the Federal Excessive Court docket that the EFCC wrote a letter to the London Court docket which made the overseas court docket refuse to confess him to bail.
Ekweremadu’s allegations have been contained in an software he filed earlier than the Nigerian court docket looking for an order of the court docket to put aside interim order granted in favour of the Federal Authorities for forfeiture of his 40 properties within the nation and outdoors the nation.
The ex-Deputy Senate President within the software by his counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), claimed that the forfeiture order was granted to the Federal Authorities in error as a result of the EFCC suppressed data and information in respect of the properties.
Particularly, the detained Senator alleged that the EFCC fraudulently obtained the forfeiture order for the federal government by concealing data that the investigation on the 40 properties began way back to 2008.
Amongst others, he alleged that the EFCC was absolutely conscious that he was in detention in London when the appliance for forfeiture of the properties was filed and argued.
He stated that the anti-graft company intentionally refused to confide in the court docket that he was in London detention and wouldn’t be capable to counter the forfeiture request.
Ekweremadu, due to this fact, prayed the court docket to put aside the forfeiture order and keep proceedings within the matter till he resolves his ordeal earlier than the London Court docket.
Nonetheless, counsel to the EFCC, Silvanus Tahir (SAN), denied that the fee was behind Ekweremadu’s ordeal.
Whereas admitting that EFCC wrote the London Court docket primarily based on a particular request, he stated that it was a standard routine for anti-graft companies to alternate data that will be of assist to 1 one other.
Tahir didn’t oppose the request for a keep of proceedings until Ekweremadu absolutely resolve his matter earlier than the London Court docket however nonetheless, vehemently opposed the request for setting apart the forfeiture order.
Justice Ekwo after taking arguments from events mounted January 25 subsequent 12 months for ruling within the matter.
The Court docket had on Friday, November 4 ordered interim forfeiture of 40 landed property linked to Ekweremadu in some components of the nation and outdoors the nation.
Justice Ekwo issued the order following an ex -parte movement filed and moved by Ibrahim Buba, lawyer to the EFCC.
The Choose, who granted the movement, ordered the EFCC to publish the interim forfeiture order of the property in a nationwide every day inside seven days.
He had directed anyone who has an curiosity within the forfeited property to point inside 14 days of the publication of the interim forfeiture order why the property shouldn’t be completely forfeited to the Federal Authorities.
The affected properties included 10 property in Enugu, three in the US of America, two within the UK, one in Lagos, 9 in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates and 15 positioned within the Federal Capital Territory.
[ad_2]
Source link