[ad_1]
A lawyer for Johnny Depp sought to discredit abuse accusations by his ex-wife, Amber Heard, throughout cross-examination on Tuesday, confronting her with audio recordings of the couple’s arguments in addition to textual content messages and love notes that the lawyer prompt confirmed Ms. Heard to be an unreliable witness.
As Ms. Heard completed her testimony at Fairfax County Circuit Court docket in Virginia, the lawyer, Camille Vasquez, challenged Ms. Heard’s assertions that she has solely ever hit Mr. Depp as a protection. Ms. Vasquez performed recordings from an argument a number of years in the past through which Ms. Heard acknowledged, “I did begin a bodily battle,” and referred to as Mr. Depp a “child.”
Ms. Heard testified that in that incident, she hit him solely as a result of he was making an attempt to “bust” into the bed room the place she was making an attempt to cover from him.
“I accused him of being a child for complaining about me hitting him when he was making an attempt to get by way of the door that I used to be making an attempt to barricade,” she testified on Tuesday.
Ms. Heard, 36, is locked in a tense authorized battle with Mr. Depp, 58, over competing defamation claims and has spent a number of hours in the course of the trial sharing her accounts of repeated bodily abuse all through their relationship, in addition to a number of cases of sexual assault. Mr. Depp has denied ever hitting or sexually assaulting her and has accused her of being the abuser within the relationship.
Mr. Depp sued Ms. Heard three years in the past over an op-ed, revealed in The Washington Submit, through which she referred to as herself a “public determine representing home abuse.” Ms. Heard countersued Mr. Depp, saying that his former lawyer had defamed her by calling her accusations of abuse a hoax.
Throughout one a part of her questioning, Ms. Vasquez challenged an account of the aftermath of an incident in Australia in 2015, through which, in line with Ms. Heard, Mr. Depp sexually assaulted her with a bottle and beat her whereas he was intoxicated on MDMA. Ms. Heard testified that after Mr. Depp’s assault, she had a bruised jaw, in addition to cuts on her arms and toes from damaged glass on the bottom.
“There’s not a single medical file reflecting therapy for any of these accidents, is there, Ms. Heard?” Ms. Vasquez requested.
“I didn’t search therapy,” Ms. Heard replied.
Mr. Depp has testified that he was the individual injured that evening when Ms. Heard threw a vodka bottle, hitting his hand and severing a part of one in all his fingers. Ms. Heard stated he injured his finger by smashing a wall-mounted cellphone into “smithereens” whereas in a rage; Ms. Vasquez pointed to an absence of photographic proof of the damaged cellphone or of the accidents Ms. Heard stated she suffered that evening.
Ms. Heard stated documentation of the abuse was incomplete as a result of she solely began taking pictures of her accidents “by the way,” when she needed to point out a pal or her mom. She by no means envisioned a authorized battle like this, she stated.
Ms. Vasquez additionally offered a love be aware that Ms. Heard wrote to Mr. Depp about two months after the Australia incident, which included the road, “I’ve seen in you the true bones of friendship and respect.”
Ms. Heard stated the couple had been in a “honeymoon interval” on the time.
As in Mr. Depp’s testimony, Ms. Heard’s cross-examination concerned an airing of insults she had hurled at him throughout arguments. In a single recording, Ms. Heard may be heard calling him a “sellout” and a “joke.” She acknowledged on the stand that she referred to as him “horrible, ugly issues,” noting that he referred to as her names, too. (In her attorneys’s cross-examination of Mr. Depp, they introduced ahead a number of textual content messages to different individuals through which he referred to Ms. Heard utilizing insults and obscenities, together with calling her a “nugatory hooker.”)
Central to the case is the op-ed, and Ms. Vasquez sought to determine that, even when Ms. Heard didn’t point out Mr. Depp by identify within the piece, it was clear that the topic was their relationship. Ms. Heard confirmed that when she stated she turned a “public determine representing home abuse,” she was referring to getting a short lived restraining order towards Mr. Depp in 2016.
Johnny Depp’s Libel Case Towards Amber Heard
Within the courtroom. A defamation trial involving the previously married actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard is presently underway in Fairfax County Circuit Court docket in Virginia. Here’s what to know in regards to the case:
At one level, Ms. Vasquez centered on the article’s headline: “I spoke up towards sexual violence — and confronted our tradition’s wrath. That has to vary.” Ms. Heard denied writing the headline, testifying that The Washington Submit didn’t seek the advice of her on it, and stated she had no intention of constructing public her allegations of sexual assault in that op-ed. When she tweeted the op-ed, Ms. Heard testified, she didn’t understand what the headline stated.
“Not very cautious about what you publish, are you, Ms. Heard?” Ms. Vasquez requested.
“I simply didn’t discover the title,” she stated.
After Ms. Heard left the stand, the jury heard prerecorded testimony from iO Tillett Wright, a former pal of the couple who stated he by no means noticed both of them hit the opposite. However he stated that in 2015, shortly after a battle through which Ms. Heard stated Mr. Depp had pulled out chunks of her hair, he witnessed accidents to her scalp.
All through Ms. Heard’s testimony, which occurred over 4 days of the trial, Mr. Depp has stored his focus away from his ex-wife on the stand, typically gazing a display screen in entrance of him. On Monday, Ms. Vasquez stated he seemed away from her as a result of he had promised her that she would by no means see his eyes once more.
However throughout redirect on Tuesday, one in all Ms. Heard’s attorneys, Elaine Charlson Bredehoft, requested her why she thought Mr. Depp had prevented her.
“As a result of he’s responsible, as a result of he is aware of he’s mendacity,” Ms. Heard stated. “In any other case, why can’t he take a look at me?”
[ad_2]
Source link