[ad_1]
A civic group, the Centre for Social Justice, Fairness and Transparency, has sued former Lawyer-Normal of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mike Aondoakaa, over alleged violation of a Supreme Court docket’s judgement.
The civic society, in go well with quantity FHC/AB/CS/770/2022, prayed the Federal Excessive Court docket in Abuja, to prosecute the previous AGF for flouting a judgement by the apex court docket which barred him from contesting for public workplace for 10years.
SaharaReporters in February 2022 reported that Aondoakaa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, was barred from holding public workplace within the nation.
Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun of the Supreme Court docket in a unanimous judgment delivered on December 10, 2021, had affirmed a judgment of the Court docket of Attraction, Calabar division, which had earlier upheld a Federal Excessive Court docket resolution that barred the previous Minister below late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua’s administration from occupying public workplace in Nigeria.
Within the Court docket of Attraction’s judgement on June 1, 2010, Justice A.F.A. Ademola had ordered, “1. A declaration is hereby made that the 2nd Defendant undermined and subverted the rule of legislation, the due administration of justice and integrity of the judiciary within the letters of eighth January, 2008 and sixteenth February 2009 written by him within the capability of the Defendant.
“2. A declaration is hereby made that 2nd Defendant is just not a reliable, match and correct particular person to carry workplace as the first Defendant having regards to the oaths of Allegiance and workplace.”
Within the go well with by the civic group filed by F.S. Jimba, Esq., the plaintiff joined the All Progressives Congress, APC and the Unbiased Nationwide Electoral Fee, as 2nd and third defendants within the matter.
The CSO prayed the court docket to find out whether or not having regard to the choice of the Supreme Court docket in Attraction No. SC/939/2015 between Michael Okay. Aondoakaa, SAN vs (1) Emmanuel Bassey Obot (2) Lawyer Normal of the Federation and Minister of Justice delivered on the tenth day of December, 2021, the first Defendant is entitled to vie for, search or howsoever point out curiosity in occupying any public workplace within the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Additionally, the organisation prayed the court docket to grant the next reliefs: “A declaration that by advantage of the choice of the Supreme Court docket in Attraction No. SC/939/2015 between Michael Okay. Aondoakaa, SAN vs (1) Emmanuel Bassey Obot (2) Lawyer-Normal of the Federation and Minister of Justice delivered on the tenth day of December, 2021 and Part 235 of the Structure of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), the first Defendant can not point out curiosity in, vie for, take part in any processes designed to provide an occupant of a public workplace within the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
”A declaration that the conduct of the first Defendant in indicating curiosity, buying the expression of curiosity and nomination types of the 2nd Defendant and all different steps and motion taken by the first Defendant in his quest to vie for the workplace of Governor of Benue State below the Platform of the 2nd Defendant is in contravention and contemptuous of the choice of the Supreme Court docket in Attraction No. SC/939/2015 between Michael Okay. Aondoakaa, SAN vs (1) Emmanuel Bassey Obot (2) Lawyer Normal of the Federation and Minister of Justice delivered on the tenth day of December, 2021.”
[ad_2]
Source link