CJN desires modification of Nigerian legal guidelines to cease ‘most’ instances at Enchantment Court docket

The Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Olukayode Ariwoola, has advocated an modification to the Nigerian structure to cease most instances from attending to the Supreme Court docket.

Mr Ariwoola spoke towards the backdrop of the big workload the 10-member Supreme Court docket at present grapples with, with many civil and political instances lingering for years earlier than being determined.

The CJN mentioned this on Monday in Abuja on the particular session of the Supreme Court docket to mark the graduation of the 2023/2024 authorized 12 months and conferment of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) on 58 legal professionals.

“I’ve made it clear at totally different events that it isn’t each dispute that should discover its strategy to the court docket, and it isn’t each matter that should come as much as the Supreme Court docket on attraction,” Mr Ariwoola mentioned.

“Our legal guidelines should be amended to make most appeals finish on the Court docket of Enchantment,” he added, saying the appellate court docket is competent to adjudicate on all instances.

Mr Ariwoola additionally urged Nigerians to be much less litigious and embrace different dispute-resolution mechanisms.

There have been futile calls by retiring justices of the Supreme Court docket for a discount in the kind of instances that get to the Supreme Court docket. Nevertheless, solely amendments to the Nigerian structure and different related legal guidelines by the parliament can obtain that if signed into legislation by the president.

Breakdown of Supreme Court docket instances

Giving a breakdown of instances that have been determined and people pending on the court docket, the CJN mentioned a complete of 1,271 appeals and motions have been filed within the outgone 12 months.

“Out of those, we heard 388 political appeals, 215 legal appeals, and 464 civil appeals. Equally, the court docket thought-about a complete variety of 49 legal motions, 153 civil motions, and two political motions,” he mentioned.

The CJN disclosed that the Supreme Court docket, between September 2022 and July 2023, delivered a complete variety of 251 judgements.

“Out of those, 125 have been political appeals, 81 have been civil appeals and 45 have been legal appeals. Inside the interval beneath overview (exactly 10 months’ length), a complete variety of 91 Rulings have been delivered by the Honourable Court docket,” Mr Ariwoola mentioned, praising the Supreme Court docket for its output within the final authorized 12 months.

With lower than a 12 months left for Mr Ariwoola because the CJN, he vowed to go away a legacy of getting 11 extra justices to the Supreme Court docket to realize the unprecedented full complement of 21 justices.

‘Corrupt choose shakes litigants religion’

Talking on the necessity for judges to be upright, the CJN mentioned integrity stays an important high quality of a judicial officer.

He urged judges to exhibit “the requirements of integrity, morality, and good behaviour” within the discharge of their duties.

“In a scenario the place a choose decides a case wrongly out of motives, it shakes the religion of the litigant public; and by extension, the entire society.”

Mr Ariwoola famous {that a} corrupt choose “has no proper to proceed to occupy the chair as a judicial officer.”

He admonished judges to “lead a disciplined and principled way of life that may improve their belief and integrity quotient.”

Public confidence within the Nigerian judiciary has plummeted in current occasions due to allegations of corruption towards judges.

A former President of the Nigerian Bar Affiliation (NBA), Olumide Akpata, not too long ago spoke about corruption and different ills plaguing the nation’s judicial system.

Whereas additionally retiring from the Supreme Court docket bench final month, Dattijo Muhammad criticised the Nigerian judiciary for alleged corruption that he mentioned permeated its hierarchies.

He additionally criticised some current choices of the Supreme Court docket and different Nigerian courts, in addition to the flawed and arbitrary appointments of judges within the nation.

He made scathing feedback in regards to the alleged corrupt dealing with of the judiciary’s funds and the judiciary’s affairs within the Supreme Court docket and different courts down the hierarchy of the Nigerian judiciary.

AGF, others communicate

In an deal with on the Supreme Court docket occasion on Monday, the Legal professional-Normal of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, suggested the Nationwide Judicial Council (NJC) to quicken the method of filling the vacancies on the Supreme Court docket.

Mr Fagbemi, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), expressed President Bola Tinubu’s “readiness to implement judicial reforms with the cooperation of the judiciary.

“We, due to this fact, earnestly await the judiciary to set the ball rolling to allow the opposite arms to play their half on this essential facet of nation-building,” he mentioned.

Delays within the adjudication of instances have hampered environment friendly justice supply in Nigeria, with authorized specialists calling for pressing reforms.

READ ALSO: NBA reacts to CJN’s resignation, expectations from successor

The Physique of Senior Advocates of Nigeria (BOSAN) represented by Ebun Sofunde, a SAN, mentioned Nigerians have been quick dropping hope within the capability of the judiciary to ship justice timeously.

In response to the issue, Mr Sofunde mentioned disgruntled Nigerians have been resorting to legislation enforcement brokers for settling disputes, a scenario he described as unlawful.

“Regulation enforcement brokers now fill the void created by inefficient judicial system.

“When judges are overwhelmed by work burden, they see adjudication of instances as perfunctory,” he mentioned.

The lawyer defined that extreme workload on judges impacts negatively on the standard of choices emanating from the courts.

He warned that residents’ lack of confidence within the justice system births anarchy.

He suggested the Authorized Practitioners Privileges Committee (LPPC), a physique saddled with the conferment of the rank of SAN, to overview its standards when it comes to the variety of concluded instances legal professionals are required to have of their kitty earlier than making use of for the distinguished award.

Mr Sofunde famous that the criterion regarding the variety of instances to be filed by SAN candidates places stress on the courts as legal professionals lodge frivolous fits that find yourself clogging the courts’ dockets.

Advising the brand new SANs, the AGF warned towards unprofessional conduct.

He mentioned the most recent pointers of the LPPC don’t allow restoration of the SAN rank as soon as it’s withdrawn for violation of the principles.

Mr Fagbemi urged the legal professionals to help the courts in justice dispensation.