Key Factors:
- Former fighter pilot Daniel Duggan is eligible for extradition to the USA.
- Duggan was arrested for breaching arms trafficking and has spent 19 months in a most safety jail.
- He claims that each Australian and American intelligence companies have been conscious of his work.
He has 15 days to use for a evaluation within the Federal Courtroom, in any other case, it falls to Lawyer-Common Mark Dreyfus to find out whether or not he needs to be surrendered to the US.
![Supporters of former US Marine Daniel Duggan stand with a banner calling for his extradition to the United States to be stopped.](https://i0.wp.com/images.sbs.com.au/a7/f8/3826284542eb846fe6a3d291df53/20240524182662914100-original.jpg?resize=7471%2C4981&ssl=1)
Duggan’s supporters say the costs are politically motivated. (AAP Picture/Bianca De Marchi) Supply: AAP / BIANCA DE MARCHI/AAPIMAGE
The 55-year-old was arrested in Australia on the behest of the US after being accused of breaching arms trafficking legal guidelines by offering navy coaching to Chinese language pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012, allegedly receiving about $100,000 for his companies.
In a letter from jail, seen by the Australian Related Press (AAP), Duggan stated he believed his actions weren’t unlawful and the Australian Safety Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and the US Naval Central Intelligence Service (NCIS) knew of his work.
‘No warning’ that work was unlawful
ASIO stated it was unable to remark as a result of the matter was earlier than the court docket.
“Our authorities ought to present some guts, our authorities ought to make it clear that being an Australian citizen issues, and that when one other nation comes for you, they will defend you as greatest they will … however we have seen none of that,” he stated.
‘Ticking a field’
“We respectfully ask the attorney-general to take one other look … and to carry my husband house,” she stated.
![Saffrien Duggan, wife of Daniel Duggan.](https://i0.wp.com/images.sbs.com.au/e9/fa/c70d86664f0eafb406564312739b/20240516140812263321-original.jpg?resize=7068%2C4712&ssl=1)
Saffrine Duggan says the attorney-general should take one other take a look at her husband’s case. Supply: AAP / MICK TSIKAS/AAPIMAGE
Duggan’s lawyer, Bret Walker, earlier conceded there was no authorized argument to be mounted throughout the temporary listening to in Sydney’s Downing Centre Native Courtroom.
A spokesman for the attorney-general stated the federal government didn’t touch upon extradition issues.
‘We’ll battle it doesn’t matter what’
“They’ve executed every thing of their energy to make this tough for my household, to try to break Dan and to interrupt us, however we are going to battle it doesn’t matter what,” Saffrine stated.