[ad_1]
How do you are feeling about spam? Would you prefer to get extra unsolicited messages in your electronic mail? Additionally, would you need them land instantly in your electronic mail inbox, as an alternative of being routed to your spam folder?
Maintain that thought. Since you’ll wish to know what is going on on with Gmail.
Earlier this month, attorneys for Google despatched a 15-page letter to the Federal Election Fee asking for an advisory opinion on a plan to begin exempting some political emails in Gmail from spam.
Particularly, Google desires the FEC to weigh in “on a proposal to launch a pilot program” underneath which emails from some FEC-registered political committees would “not be affected by types of spam detection to which they might in any other case be topic.”
As an alternative, Gmail customers would wish to mark these messages manually as spam, one after the other, in any other case they’d preserve coming. Google would additionally give knowledge about what number of emails wind up in individuals’s Gmail inboxes to the candidates and political committees.
Three fast observations:
- First, I write an electronic mail publication that goes to 1000’s of individuals each weekday, so I can communicate with some authority: It could be an absolute dream to by no means have to fret about spam folders. However, this proposal would apply solely to political emails.
- Second, this could characterize a really huge change due to the sheer quantity of people that use Gmail: someplace between 1.5 billion and 1.8 billion individuals in line with varied estimates. In actual fact, I simply checked my knowledge, and simply over half of my readers have electronic mail addresses ending in “gmail.com.”
- Lastly, this transformation is the very last thing that the majority Gmail customers truly need, at the very least if the a whole bunch of public feedback the FEC has acquired since Google’s July 1 request are any indication.
In actual fact, having simply learn by 215 emailed public feedback that the FEC made public in one among its batches final week, just about each single remark opposed Google’s request.
(The FEC’s case file could be discovered right here; many of the paperwork are .pdfs.)
A couple of consultant feedback:
- “Concerning the beneath, completely not…”
- “Please firmly and unequivocally reject … This can be a horrible thought.”
- “Completely no. A thousand instances no.”
- “Do. Not. Grant. This. Request.”
- “Anybody proposing this concept of political SPAM bypassing spam filters needs to be tied to a TV set with their eyes pried open and compelled to observe a whole bunch of hours of ‘my opponent is a scumbag’ adverts.”
- “Permitting [G]oogle to prioritize political emails … would principally imply that Google was offering a big political donation to each politician sending emails to Gmail addresses.”
Truly, that final remark appears to level to what is going on on behind the scenes.
Earlier this 12 months, Republican politicians complained to the FEC that Google was unfairly censoring Republican fundraising emails in Gmail by sending them to spam at a better charge than Democratic emails.
Republicans alleged this amounted to a sequence of “unlawful, company in-kind contributions” to Democrats.
Google vehemently denied any bias, and final month, Google CEO Sundar Pichai reportedly flew to Washington to satisfy with prime Republicans and pitch them on the no-spam thought.
As a no-longer-practicing lawyer who nonetheless follows authorized points like this, I am intrigued and desirous to see how issues play out. Apparently, I am not the one one.
Final week, the FEC introduced it is extending the deadline by which individuals can file feedback to assist or object to Google’s plan.
The brand new deadline to chime in: August 5.
“There’s uncommon public curiosity on this request,” tweeted FEC commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub, “we should always hear as a lot suggestions as we will.”
If you would like to register your opinion, you are able to do so by sending an electronic mail to ao@fec.gov, and together with the reference variety of Google’s request: “AO 2022-14.”
Let’s simply hope no matter you ship does not go to spam.
[ad_2]
Source link
[ad_1]
How do you are feeling about spam? Would you prefer to get extra unsolicited messages in your electronic mail? Additionally, would you need them land instantly in your electronic mail inbox, as an alternative of being routed to your spam folder?
Maintain that thought. Since you’ll wish to know what is going on on with Gmail.
Earlier this month, attorneys for Google despatched a 15-page letter to the Federal Election Fee asking for an advisory opinion on a plan to begin exempting some political emails in Gmail from spam.
Particularly, Google desires the FEC to weigh in “on a proposal to launch a pilot program” underneath which emails from some FEC-registered political committees would “not be affected by types of spam detection to which they might in any other case be topic.”
As an alternative, Gmail customers would wish to mark these messages manually as spam, one after the other, in any other case they’d preserve coming. Google would additionally give knowledge about what number of emails wind up in individuals’s Gmail inboxes to the candidates and political committees.
Three fast observations:
- First, I write an electronic mail publication that goes to 1000’s of individuals each weekday, so I can communicate with some authority: It could be an absolute dream to by no means have to fret about spam folders. However, this proposal would apply solely to political emails.
- Second, this could characterize a really huge change due to the sheer quantity of people that use Gmail: someplace between 1.5 billion and 1.8 billion individuals in line with varied estimates. In actual fact, I simply checked my knowledge, and simply over half of my readers have electronic mail addresses ending in “gmail.com.”
- Lastly, this transformation is the very last thing that the majority Gmail customers truly need, at the very least if the a whole bunch of public feedback the FEC has acquired since Google’s July 1 request are any indication.
In actual fact, having simply learn by 215 emailed public feedback that the FEC made public in one among its batches final week, just about each single remark opposed Google’s request.
(The FEC’s case file could be discovered right here; many of the paperwork are .pdfs.)
A couple of consultant feedback:
- “Concerning the beneath, completely not…”
- “Please firmly and unequivocally reject … This can be a horrible thought.”
- “Completely no. A thousand instances no.”
- “Do. Not. Grant. This. Request.”
- “Anybody proposing this concept of political SPAM bypassing spam filters needs to be tied to a TV set with their eyes pried open and compelled to observe a whole bunch of hours of ‘my opponent is a scumbag’ adverts.”
- “Permitting [G]oogle to prioritize political emails … would principally imply that Google was offering a big political donation to each politician sending emails to Gmail addresses.”
Truly, that final remark appears to level to what is going on on behind the scenes.
Earlier this 12 months, Republican politicians complained to the FEC that Google was unfairly censoring Republican fundraising emails in Gmail by sending them to spam at a better charge than Democratic emails.
Republicans alleged this amounted to a sequence of “unlawful, company in-kind contributions” to Democrats.
Google vehemently denied any bias, and final month, Google CEO Sundar Pichai reportedly flew to Washington to satisfy with prime Republicans and pitch them on the no-spam thought.
As a no-longer-practicing lawyer who nonetheless follows authorized points like this, I am intrigued and desirous to see how issues play out. Apparently, I am not the one one.
Final week, the FEC introduced it is extending the deadline by which individuals can file feedback to assist or object to Google’s plan.
The brand new deadline to chime in: August 5.
“There’s uncommon public curiosity on this request,” tweeted FEC commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub, “we should always hear as a lot suggestions as we will.”
If you would like to register your opinion, you are able to do so by sending an electronic mail to ao@fec.gov, and together with the reference variety of Google’s request: “AO 2022-14.”
Let’s simply hope no matter you ship does not go to spam.
[ad_2]
Source link
[ad_1]
How do you are feeling about spam? Would you prefer to get extra unsolicited messages in your electronic mail? Additionally, would you need them land instantly in your electronic mail inbox, as an alternative of being routed to your spam folder?
Maintain that thought. Since you’ll wish to know what is going on on with Gmail.
Earlier this month, attorneys for Google despatched a 15-page letter to the Federal Election Fee asking for an advisory opinion on a plan to begin exempting some political emails in Gmail from spam.
Particularly, Google desires the FEC to weigh in “on a proposal to launch a pilot program” underneath which emails from some FEC-registered political committees would “not be affected by types of spam detection to which they might in any other case be topic.”
As an alternative, Gmail customers would wish to mark these messages manually as spam, one after the other, in any other case they’d preserve coming. Google would additionally give knowledge about what number of emails wind up in individuals’s Gmail inboxes to the candidates and political committees.
Three fast observations:
- First, I write an electronic mail publication that goes to 1000’s of individuals each weekday, so I can communicate with some authority: It could be an absolute dream to by no means have to fret about spam folders. However, this proposal would apply solely to political emails.
- Second, this could characterize a really huge change due to the sheer quantity of people that use Gmail: someplace between 1.5 billion and 1.8 billion individuals in line with varied estimates. In actual fact, I simply checked my knowledge, and simply over half of my readers have electronic mail addresses ending in “gmail.com.”
- Lastly, this transformation is the very last thing that the majority Gmail customers truly need, at the very least if the a whole bunch of public feedback the FEC has acquired since Google’s July 1 request are any indication.
In actual fact, having simply learn by 215 emailed public feedback that the FEC made public in one among its batches final week, just about each single remark opposed Google’s request.
(The FEC’s case file could be discovered right here; many of the paperwork are .pdfs.)
A couple of consultant feedback:
- “Concerning the beneath, completely not…”
- “Please firmly and unequivocally reject … This can be a horrible thought.”
- “Completely no. A thousand instances no.”
- “Do. Not. Grant. This. Request.”
- “Anybody proposing this concept of political SPAM bypassing spam filters needs to be tied to a TV set with their eyes pried open and compelled to observe a whole bunch of hours of ‘my opponent is a scumbag’ adverts.”
- “Permitting [G]oogle to prioritize political emails … would principally imply that Google was offering a big political donation to each politician sending emails to Gmail addresses.”
Truly, that final remark appears to level to what is going on on behind the scenes.
Earlier this 12 months, Republican politicians complained to the FEC that Google was unfairly censoring Republican fundraising emails in Gmail by sending them to spam at a better charge than Democratic emails.
Republicans alleged this amounted to a sequence of “unlawful, company in-kind contributions” to Democrats.
Google vehemently denied any bias, and final month, Google CEO Sundar Pichai reportedly flew to Washington to satisfy with prime Republicans and pitch them on the no-spam thought.
As a no-longer-practicing lawyer who nonetheless follows authorized points like this, I am intrigued and desirous to see how issues play out. Apparently, I am not the one one.
Final week, the FEC introduced it is extending the deadline by which individuals can file feedback to assist or object to Google’s plan.
The brand new deadline to chime in: August 5.
“There’s uncommon public curiosity on this request,” tweeted FEC commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub, “we should always hear as a lot suggestions as we will.”
If you would like to register your opinion, you are able to do so by sending an electronic mail to ao@fec.gov, and together with the reference variety of Google’s request: “AO 2022-14.”
Let’s simply hope no matter you ship does not go to spam.
[ad_2]
Source link
[ad_1]
How do you are feeling about spam? Would you prefer to get extra unsolicited messages in your electronic mail? Additionally, would you need them land instantly in your electronic mail inbox, as an alternative of being routed to your spam folder?
Maintain that thought. Since you’ll wish to know what is going on on with Gmail.
Earlier this month, attorneys for Google despatched a 15-page letter to the Federal Election Fee asking for an advisory opinion on a plan to begin exempting some political emails in Gmail from spam.
Particularly, Google desires the FEC to weigh in “on a proposal to launch a pilot program” underneath which emails from some FEC-registered political committees would “not be affected by types of spam detection to which they might in any other case be topic.”
As an alternative, Gmail customers would wish to mark these messages manually as spam, one after the other, in any other case they’d preserve coming. Google would additionally give knowledge about what number of emails wind up in individuals’s Gmail inboxes to the candidates and political committees.
Three fast observations:
- First, I write an electronic mail publication that goes to 1000’s of individuals each weekday, so I can communicate with some authority: It could be an absolute dream to by no means have to fret about spam folders. However, this proposal would apply solely to political emails.
- Second, this could characterize a really huge change due to the sheer quantity of people that use Gmail: someplace between 1.5 billion and 1.8 billion individuals in line with varied estimates. In actual fact, I simply checked my knowledge, and simply over half of my readers have electronic mail addresses ending in “gmail.com.”
- Lastly, this transformation is the very last thing that the majority Gmail customers truly need, at the very least if the a whole bunch of public feedback the FEC has acquired since Google’s July 1 request are any indication.
In actual fact, having simply learn by 215 emailed public feedback that the FEC made public in one among its batches final week, just about each single remark opposed Google’s request.
(The FEC’s case file could be discovered right here; many of the paperwork are .pdfs.)
A couple of consultant feedback:
- “Concerning the beneath, completely not…”
- “Please firmly and unequivocally reject … This can be a horrible thought.”
- “Completely no. A thousand instances no.”
- “Do. Not. Grant. This. Request.”
- “Anybody proposing this concept of political SPAM bypassing spam filters needs to be tied to a TV set with their eyes pried open and compelled to observe a whole bunch of hours of ‘my opponent is a scumbag’ adverts.”
- “Permitting [G]oogle to prioritize political emails … would principally imply that Google was offering a big political donation to each politician sending emails to Gmail addresses.”
Truly, that final remark appears to level to what is going on on behind the scenes.
Earlier this 12 months, Republican politicians complained to the FEC that Google was unfairly censoring Republican fundraising emails in Gmail by sending them to spam at a better charge than Democratic emails.
Republicans alleged this amounted to a sequence of “unlawful, company in-kind contributions” to Democrats.
Google vehemently denied any bias, and final month, Google CEO Sundar Pichai reportedly flew to Washington to satisfy with prime Republicans and pitch them on the no-spam thought.
As a no-longer-practicing lawyer who nonetheless follows authorized points like this, I am intrigued and desirous to see how issues play out. Apparently, I am not the one one.
Final week, the FEC introduced it is extending the deadline by which individuals can file feedback to assist or object to Google’s plan.
The brand new deadline to chime in: August 5.
“There’s uncommon public curiosity on this request,” tweeted FEC commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub, “we should always hear as a lot suggestions as we will.”
If you would like to register your opinion, you are able to do so by sending an electronic mail to ao@fec.gov, and together with the reference variety of Google’s request: “AO 2022-14.”
Let’s simply hope no matter you ship does not go to spam.
[ad_2]
Source link