[ad_1]
Wolves boss Gary O’Neil provided his sympathy to referee Stuart Attwell after the beleaguered match official was embroiled in additional controversy in Bournemouth’s 1-0 win at Molineux.
Attwell has been within the highlight for his function as VAR in denying Nottingham Forest three penalties in Sunday’s 2-0 defeat at Everton, which led Forest to insinuate bias as he helps relegation rivals Luton.
And controversy adopted him round after he adjudged Matheus Cunha to have fouled Justin Kluivert in an off-the-ball incident within the build-up to Hee Chan Hwang’s second-half equaliser, which regarded to have cancelled out Antoine Semenyo’s first-half opener.
It was not noticed in actual time however Attwell opted to present the foul following recommendation from VAR Darren England to look at it once more on the pitchside monitor.
O’Neil didn’t wish to touch upon the choice, having spoken at size about VAR selections this season, however stated he had no points with Attwell being appointed to the sport.
“No, no qualms in any respect, I hope he’s OK. A tricky few days for him. I hope he’s doing OK,” O’Neil stated.
“I don’t have any ideas on the choice, I believe it’s actually necessary I focus totally on my staff and Wolves.
“I’ve spent a whole lot of time this season answering questions round VAR and selections and I don’t have any ideas, everybody else will see the incident and make their very own selections. My focus is totally on us.
“I’ve answered your questions round it so many instances after so many video games and all that goes out after the sport is both me moaning or not moaning about selections.
“It doesn’t assist anyone, let’s let these guys work out what’s the appropriate determination and let me work out how one can get this staff some extra factors between now and the top of the season.”
Attwell remained within the thick of the motion as he then confirmed a straight crimson card to Bournemouth defender Milos Kerkez for a foul on Matt Doherty in a choice which survived one other VAR examine.
Cherries boss Andoni Iraola stated they might attraction in opposition to the choice, however was in settlement with the disallowed aim.
He stated: “I believe Justin will get concerned within the play after and he can’t defend the cross correctly and that’s the reason I believe it’s clear and apparent and everybody sees the foul.
“It could be controversial if he doesn’t have an effect on the play and doesn’t take part anymore however he’s there and the one who can’t defend the cross. I don’t assume it’s controversial.”
[ad_2]
Source link