[ad_1]
A human rights lawyer, Allen Sowore, has faulted the 14-count allegation introduced in opposition to the embattled Deputy Governor of Ondo State, Fortunate Aiyedatiwa, by the state Home of Meeting.
Sowore, who described the allegations as obscure, expressed concern in regards to the improvement, stressing that the allegations had been cooked as much as nail Aiyedatiwa.
The state Home of Meeting had accused the embattled deputy governor of gross misconduct and monetary recklessness, amongst others.
Sowore, in a press release issued on the weekend and made obtainable to The Guardian, argued that the allegations had been merely a smokescreen supposed to divert the eye of the individuals and residents from elevating questions over the whereabouts of Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu.
Sowore additional expressed disappointment that the preliminary allegation involving spending N300 million on armoured autos, which was beforehand levelled in opposition to Aiyedatiwa, was conspicuously absent from the cost sheet.
In accordance with the lawyer, the omission raised doubts in regards to the credibility of the allegations in opposition to the embattled deputy governor.
Concerning the primary allegation, which claimed that Aiyedatiwa granted an interview in opposition to the governor, Sowore stated:”Aside from the truth that Part 39 of the Structure of the Federal Republic of Nigeria ensures freedom of expression, the place precisely did the deputy governor make unfair feedback in regards to the governor’s well being? The governor has sacked all of the deputy governor’s media aides for a similar offence, but there isn’t any proof.
“The motion of Mr. Governor on this regard is, in impact, an assault on press freedom. The media handlers of Mr. Governor haven’t disclosed any details about the governor’s well being standing or whereabouts to keep away from misinformation.”
On the allegation that the deputy governor collected cash to journey with out truly travelling, Sowore stated the drafters of the allegations decreased the workplace of the deputy governor to an errand civil servant.
He stated: “There’s a template for the preparations of journey for the governor or his deputy. The governor or his deputy don’t deal with or see the cash meant for his or her journeys.
“Those that deal with the cash are civil servants known as protocol officers. They’re those who make or write the proposals utilizing the present template.
“For Mr. Governor, it’s about N6 million a day if he travels exterior the state. The cash is supposed for the convoy – fueling of autos, feeding, treatment, lodging and the overall welfare of the safety brokers, drivers, medical personnel and the members of the press crew connected to the workplace of the governor or his deputy, because the case could also be. The place such journeys are cancelled, it behooves the protocol officers to return the cash to the vault.”
On the allegation of economic malfeasance in opposition to Aiyedatiwa, Sowore stated: “There’s a upkeep officer, usually a licensed engineer, who is totally in control of the administration and upkeep of autos.
“The acquisition of any merchandise within the state should cross via the Mission Implementation and Monitoring Unit, which is manned by the governor’s son, Babajide Akeredolu. If Babajide authorized N5.4 million for the acquisition of batteries and tyres for the autos within the deputy governor’s convoy, all of the blame goes to him as a result of he’s the gatekeeper and he’s to make sure that no merchandise is bought above the market worth.”
On the allegations of bribery and mismanagement within the native councils, Sowore famous: “These are nebulous, obscure and undefined allegations; N500 million for the administration of the native governments.
“We’ve the Ministry of Native Authorities and Chieftaincy Affairs, which is straight in control of the administration of the 18 native authorities areas within the state. What in regards to the chairmen who’re straight answerable for their respective LGAs? Who initiated the proposal? Which account was it taken from? Who authorized it?
“Bribery allegations should be supported by concrete proof, together with info on the supply, recipient and circumstances surrounding the alleged bribe. Was the bribe paid straight into the non-public account of the deputy governor? Which of the kings made the fee?”
[ad_2]
Source link