Reside Nation and Ticketmaster lawsuit: No matter occurs gained’t reduce live performance costs – Nationwide

Promoting a live performance ticket must be straightforward. At its essence, a ticket is a contract between you and a promoter that permits you entry to a particular venue at a said date and time to see a efficiency. In different phrases, it’s a factor you purchase to get you within the door. But promoting and shopping for live performance tickets is without doubt one of the most opaque client experiences within the recognized universe.

Misinformation, frustration, and ignorance about how the system works — and must work — have created a state of affairs the place followers and governments are fed up and wish one thing performed about it. Good luck with that.

The most recent salvo is an antitrust lawsuit filed by the U.S. Division of Justice towards Reside Nation, the proprietor of Ticketmaster, accusing the corporate of being imply, monopolistic and utilizing unlawful ways to stifle competitors. (Reside Nation’s response to the lawsuit will be discovered on livenationentertainment.com.)

On the coronary heart of the lawsuit are 4 principal issues:

1. Reside Nation is simply too massive and too highly effective. It bought that approach through the use of Ticketmaster and a sequence of unique ticketing contracts with venues.
2. Reside Nation has an unfair benefit over rivals because of its management of excursions and the 250+ venues it owns.
3. These circumstances allowed Reside Nation to keep up a de facto monopoly over the ticketing enterprise, permitting it to lift costs and charges.
4. Ticketmaster’s dominance limits innovation within the ticketing business, harming would-be rivals and driving up costs.

Reside Nation is definitely very, very massive, because of the 2010 merger with Ticketmaster, one thing that was accredited by the US Authorities. Final yr alone, the corporate promoted 50,059 exhibits globally, a brand new report. Ticketmaster sells about 500 million tickets a yr, and about 70 per cent of all tickets offered to main live performance venues are processed by means of Ticketmaster, in line with knowledge in a federal lawsuit filed by customers in 2022.

And sure, the worth of tickets has skyrocketed in recent times. And there’s no query the added charges and repair prices are annoying. However breaking apart Reside Nation isn’t going to alter any of that.

Earlier than you name me a Reside Nation/Ticketmaster apologist, let’s take a look at some chilly, onerous, irrefutable info about live performance tickets. It’s possible you’ll not like what you’re about to learn, however that is the real-world state of affairs.

First, when setting the worth of a live performance ticket, the buck all the time stops with the artist. An artist’s supervisor and agent will method Reside Nation (or any promoter for that matter) and say, “We wish to go on tour. Our prices are projected to be X and we’d wish to make a revenue of Y. What number of tickets do we have to promote at what value in what number of cities to make that occur?”

Reside Nation then plugs all the pieces right into a spreadsheet and comes up with a break-even quantity after which tiers of ticket costs that may make the tour worthwhile for the artist. Prices and expectations are adjusted earlier than the artist indicators off. Once more the singer/band has the ultimate say on how a lot tickets will value at face worth.

As soon as that’s labored out, Ticketmaster is used to promote the tickets. It provides a price (often a share of the face worth), which covers all its prices (consider the infrastructure and expertise required!) and permits it to make a revenue. Ticketmaster is, in any case, a enterprise unto itself. And other than the odd glitch — hey, each web site goes down occasionally as a result of no expertise is ideal — Ticketmaster is excellent at promoting tickets. Given the quantity it offers with 24/7/365, nobody does it higher.

What concerning the venue or facility price? This cash covers the prices incurred by the venue (electrical energy, safety, and so forth.) and to make a little bit of a revenue. These charges make it economically attainable for a constructing to host a live performance. No charges, no exhibits. Would you do all the required work at no cost?

Having these charges separate from the face worth of the live performance ticket makes the act look good. It makes them seem that they’re on the aspect of the followers and large, dangerous Ticketmaster and Reside Nation are liable for any monetary ache on the a part of the fan. And when one thing goes mistaken — keep in mind the Taylor Swift Eras Tour debacle? — the blame falls on Ticketmaster and Reside Nation and never the act.

There have been calls for for all-in pricing. Not that way back, airways used to promote fares that appeared insanely low as a result of they didn’t embody all of the taxes and repair prices. By the point you bought your ticket, it might have been twice the marketed value. Now not. Airways should give travellers the true value of the ticket with all the pieces baked in. Within the music world, many artists have balked at this as a result of they wish to make it appear like the excessive value of the ticket isn’t their fault.

What about Ticketmaster’s unique contracts (sometimes 5 years or so in size) with venues? This isn’t a lot totally different than a venue signing unique pouring rights with a brewery or a comfortable drink firm. Margins will be so skinny that venues need definitely and stability from their suppliers. Ticketmaster is simply one other provider.

What about Reside Nation’s vertical construction? Reside Nation books and promotes the exhibits that are offered by means of its Ticketmaster subsidiary with some gigs occurring in Reside Nation-owned venues. On the floor, that does look fairly monopolistic. However it’s additionally extremely environment friendly. If all the pieces is completed in-house, you may hold prices decrease.

And once more, neither Reside Nation nor Ticketmaster set the face worth of the live performance ticket. And since many artists are given a assured per-show payout by Reside Nation, the promoter assumes all the chance in relation to placing bums in seats, the price of operating Ticketmaster to promote tickets, and, within the instances the place it owns the amphitheatre, membership, or theatre, to eke out a revenue for these buildings.

Did I point out that the artist has the last word sign-off on the worth of tickets? I did? Simply wish to make certain.

So let’s say that the DOJ orders that Reside Nation be damaged up. Ticketmaster must be offered off. It’s even attainable that Reside Nation might should promote its stake within the venues it owns. Then what?

We might return to the previous days of a number of nationwide or regional promoters bidding on exhibits. The quickest solution to acquire an act’s consideration is to supply the most important assure. The profitable promoter will then be below monetary stress to cowl prices. The one approach to do this is to elucidate to the artist that they must cost extra per ticket if they need that massive assure. Ticket costs will go up, not down.

Reside Nation is engaging to artists as a result of it’s a one-stop-shop nationally and internationally. Positive, they might go along with one other promoter, however can they provide the identical phrases and performance-fee ensures? Perhaps, however I’d guessing not. Ticketmaster has numerous income streams like sponsorships that assist defray prices and to spice up ensures.

Different corporations might wish to tackle Ticketmaster. Go proper forward. Innovation by means of competitors is all the time good. However turning into a competitor to Ticketmaster would require billions in funding in software program, infrastructure, and promotion/advertising and marketing of the brand new entity, all in an effort to get right into a low-margin enterprise. They will even have to attend out any exclusivity contracts Ticketmaster presently has in place with venues. When contracts come up, there’ll inevitably be bidding wars, the worth of which will probably be handed on to the buyer by means of larger facility charges. Once more, it will trigger ticket costs to go up.

Sure, it’s attainable that an ordered breakup of Reside Nation will assist different promoters and would-be ticket sellers. Any “monopolistic practices” will probably be quashed, which can be good for the ticketing business. Perhaps customer support — all the time a bugaboo with Ticketmaster — will enhance. Maybe somebody will provide you with one other solution to simplify pricing that doesn’t require new legal guidelines being handed. Somebody would possibly provide you with a solution to successfully police the resale of tickets.

However who might purchase Ticketmaster? The price could be very, very excessive, so it’s in all probability a play by an fairness fund or another Wall Road building.

And can this handle the rising value of live performance tickets? No. Will this remedy the issue of 1,000,000 folks attempting to purchase 100,000 obtainable tickets leading to instantaneous sellouts? No. Will it handle bigger financial points like inflation and the rising prices of staging a tour? No. Will followers’ unrealistic expectations (calls for!) of shopping for an excellent seat to a high act for 50 bucks be realized? No.

What would be the benefit of a Reside Nation breakup to the buyer?

I can’t see any. Not one.

—
Alan Cross is a broadcaster with Q107 and 102.1 the Edge and a commentator for International Information.

Subscribe to Alan’s Ongoing Historical past of New Music Podcast now on Apple Podcast or Google Play