[ad_1]
The household of the Indigenous Individuals of Biafra (IPOB) chief, Nnamdi Kanu, has commenced a authorized motion towards the UK International Secretary, Rt Hon Liz Truss MP, over Kanu’s extraordinary rendition.
Kanu’s household accused the International, Commonwealth and Improvement Workplace of abdication of its duty to acknowledge and reply to Kanu’s extraordinary rendition.
The legislation agency representing the household, Bindmans LLP, despatched a pre-action letter to the International Secretary, difficult her for not having acknowledged that Kanu who possesses UK citizenship has been subjected to extraordinary rendition, unlawful detention and torture in Nigeria.
The household’s Counsel, Shirin Marker, in a swimsuit, needs the courtroom to lawfully decide what additional steps the UK Authorities needs to be taking to help Kanu based mostly on the gross violation of his human rights.
An announcement by Marker quoted by Vanguard said that the authorized motion towards the International Secretary was meant to safe justice for Kanu.
“The case raises necessary factors of precept, not solely in relation to extraordinary rendition however on the authorized duties the UK has when its residents’ human rights are abused overseas,” the household lawyer said.
Since Kanu was renditioned from Kenya in 2021, the British Excessive Fee officers have been allowed entry to the IPOB chief two occasions.
The household authorized consultant within the swimsuit instituted towards the UK International Secretary stated that there was compelling proof which proved that Kanu was renditioned.
The legislation agency additionally stated that neither Nigeria nor Kenya has offered any credible proof to counter the rendition declare.
The legislation agency contended that, “The best to liberty and safety of the particular person, and freedom from arbitrary arrest or detention has been described by the United Nations as ‘deeply entrenched human rights norms’.
“Extraordinary rendition is a elementary contravention of those ideas and a severe breach of worldwide legislation.
“The English courts have thought-about the query of the UK’s obligations to British residents who’ve been terribly rendered within the case of Abbasi v Secretary of State for International and Commonwealth Affairs [2002] EWCA Civ 1598. There, the Court docket of Attraction harassed that to be able to correctly think about whether or not to make diplomatic representations or take extra severe motion to guard a British citizen’s pursuits, the International Secretary should begin by reaching a transparent view on whether or not its citizen has suffered a ‘denial of justice’ on account of a violation of their rights and freedoms as assured by worldwide legislation.
“In Mr Kanu’s case, the International Secretary has been unwilling to succeed in a view on whether or not he has been topic to extraordinary rendition, regardless of proof submitted to her officers over the ten months which have handed since he was taken to Nigeria.
“Her refusal to kind a view on Mr Kanu’s rendition means she can’t have taken under consideration all related components nor have lawfully exercised her discretion in contemplating what additional steps to absorb respect of Mr Kanu’s rendition.
“It has now been practically a yr since Mr Kanu was topic to extraordinary rendition. Since then, he has been detained in solitary confinement in a cell six by six toes for practically 24 hours a day. To this point, the UK’s diplomatic efforts have had little or no impact. UK officers have solely been in a position to go to Mr Kanu twice while in detention, his circumstances of detention haven’t modified since that go to and no different progress has been made in
“Most remarkably, the International Secretary has been unable or unwilling to succeed in a conclusion on whether or not Mr Kanu has been topic to extraordinary rendition or not, regardless of all of the proof displaying he was. That issues as a result of she can’t make a correct determination on how to reply to what has occurred with out deciding exactly what she is responding to. Mr Kanu’s household, who convey this problem, urge her to take a decisive stance on his extraordinary rendition in order that she will correctly think about what additional steps needs to be taken to help him in mild of this egregious breach of worldwide legislation.”
Additionally responding to the household’s authorized motion, Kanu’s brother, Kingsley Kanu stated that “With daily that passes, I’m more and more involved for my brother’s welfare in detention and more and more pissed off by the UK Authorities’s ineffectiveness in aiding him.
“I hope the Court docket will rule that the International Secretary should recognise the seriousness of my brother’s state of affairs and correctly think about what different steps she will take to help him in mild of his extraordinary rendition.”
[ad_2]
Source link