PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Maine’s scarcity of public defenders allowed a person with a violent felony historical past to be launched on bail three days earlier than he went to his former girlfriend’s Auburn house, the place one other man was killed earlier than an hourslong standoff with police wherein photographs have been exchanged, two homes burned to the bottom and the assailant was finally killed by tactical group.
Leein Hinkley, 43, posted bail June 12 after a decide cited delays find a court-appointed lawyer for eradicating a probation maintain on Hinkley and lowered his bail to $1,500. Hinkley’s launch angered regulation enforcement officers and the district lawyer, who stated public security ought to outweigh delays in acquiring counsel for a person with a historical past of violent crimes.
“We acknowledge that the state wants to repair the lawyer challenge however public security shouldn’t be compromised,” District Legal professional Neil McLean Jr. stated Monday. He described Hinkley as “a particularly harmful human being.”
Hinkley had served a 15-year sentence for repeatedly stabbing his home companion and a bystander who intervened. He was again in custody for choking his present girlfriend when he went earlier than a decide on Might 24, McLean stated. District Choose Sarah Churchill set $25,000 bail, then eliminated a probation maintain and lowered the bail quantity after Hinkley had spent 2 1/2 weeks in jail and not using a lawyer.
A Maine State Police tactical group fatally shot Hinkley, who was on a rooftop, early Saturday after the standoff, which started after an individual who fought with him apparently died. The gunfire and plumes of smoke throughout his rampage late Friday and early Saturday introduced new anguish to a area that was traumatized by the killings of 13 folks at two places in neighboring Lewiston final fall.
On Monday, the court docket system took the uncommon step of issuing a press release defending the decide after public criticism from the district lawyer, the Maine Fraternal Order of Police and the Maine State Trooper’s Affiliation.
Chief Justice Valerie Stanfill stated the state’s court docket system will proceed to “malfunction” till the state addresses the scarcity of attorneys who’re prepared to symbolize defendants who’re unable to pay for an lawyer.
“The shortage of appointed counsel on this state is a constitutional disaster,” she wrote. “Because of this, daily judges should make terribly troublesome choices, balancing the constitutional rights of the accused with the wants of the general public.”
The American Civil Liberties Union of Maine sued two years in the past over the state’s system for offering attorneys for indigent shoppers that traditionally relied on personal attorneys who have been reimbursed by the state. A scathing report in 2019 outlined vital shortcomings in Maine’s system, together with lax oversight of the billing practices by the personal attorneys.
The state is making an attempt to handle the issues. These efforts embody creation of a proper public defender system with a number of taxpayer-funded workplaces throughout the state. However it can take time to handle the backlog that the ACLU of Maine describes as a whole bunch of defendants, a few of whom have waited weeks or months for an lawyer.
Within the Auburn case, Hinkley was launched from jail final 12 months after serving 15 years of a 20-year sentence. He was nonetheless on probation and confronted the potential for going again to jail to serve the rest of his sentence for the outdated crime, no matter whether or not he was convicted of the costs of choking one other lady.
The decide initially set bail $25,000 after which diminished it to $5,000 after which $1,500 with a stipulation that Hinkley stay beneath home arrest and steer clear of his sufferer. He was additionally prohibited from having a gun, McNeil stated. His former girlfriend additionally had an energetic protection-from-abuse order in place.
The Maine State Trooper’s Affiliation and Maine Fraternal Order of Police did not take a charitable view of the decide’s choice, saying she confirmed “blatant disregard for the protection of a sufferer of home violence and public security.”