[ad_1]
NEW DELHI: After repeated criticism of challenge planning in a number of infrastructure initiatives, the Ministry of Street Transport and Highways on Friday revised the framework of evaluating bids for challenge plans ready by consultants for Nationwide Freeway initiatives.
Beneath the brand new framework, deficiencies within the work carried out by consultants will characteristic prominently within the bid analysis course of by the ministry’s companies such because the Nationwide Highways Authority of India (NHAI).
The Centre will give an 80 per cent weighting to the worth of technical proposals despatched by bidding challenge consultants as in opposition to the earlier 70 per cent.
Whereas the weighting in itself has not been drastically modified, the elements of evaluating technical proposals have been overhauled to finish malpractices.
Mission planners now should present no less than 5 detailed challenge studies (DPRs) carried out earlier to be prioritised within the “earlier expertise” part, as an alternative of the current three. The weighting given to earlier expertise has been elevated.
In earlier initiatives, the Centre would usually expertise delays in land acquisition attributable to lack of due diligence in making challenge plans, and contractors would additionally discover freeway alignments to be totally different from these designated within the DPR.
Bidders must disclose deficiencies of their previous efficiency, akin to the common space variation in execution as in opposition to the unique plans, the common delay in land acquisition within the final 5 DPRs by the planner, and the common change of scope in deliberate work. Furthermore, the federal government is hoping to curb the apply of terribly low bids by eliminating the weighting given to the bottom bid in consultancy assignments.
Officers mentioned consultants would usually quote unrealistic costs to get the contract, which might at instances result in poor DPRs.
Beneath the brand new framework, all bid costs which are 25 per cent or extra beneath the common bid value shall be given a rating of 100 factors, and these shall be used because the benchmark for evaluating the factors given to all different bidders.
The sooner system allowed solely the bottom bidder to be given 100 factors.
A Mumbai-based senior analyst mentioned the transfer was in the suitable course, however it would possibly result in the unintended consequence of cartelisation by challenge consultants. Just a few events might get collectively to agree on a value band that might fall within the 25 per cent area, now that a number of events will be given 100 per cent factors, the individual mentioned.
“A central database of high quality of previous efficiency or DPR consultants must be ready by NHIDCL (Nationwide Highways & Infrastructure Improvement Company Ltd) in infracon with inputs from all executing companies of MoRTH (the ministry),” the ministry mentioned in a round, including that this train can be accomplished by April 2024 and until then the analysis of previous efficiency can be carried out on the premise of self-certification.
Furthermore, the ministry will restrict the size of the challenge to be given to consultants primarily based on the manpower declared by them, with extra elaborate penalties for false declarations of the quantity and {qualifications} of personnel.
Union Minister for Street Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari had criticised DPR consultants, claiming that the standard of challenge plans was so dangerous that he felt they used web searches to arrange them as an alternative of doing technical due diligence.
Supply: Enterprise Commonplace
The put up Technical Norms For Street Planners Get Stricter, To Get Greater Precedence first appeared on Newest India information, evaluation and studies on IPA Newspack.
[ad_2]
Source link
