The Russia-Ukraine conflict, European monetary integration, and crises

Editors’ be aware: This column is a part of the Vox debate on the financial penalties of conflict.

The European Financial and Financial Union (EMU) has weathered a number of extreme crises, notably over the last one and a half many years. The crises normally went hand in hand with reductions of monetary integration, sometimes called monetary fragmentation (see Adam et al. 2002, Baele et al. 2004, ECB 2007 and follow-up reviews, European Parliament 2016, FSB 2019, and Claessens 2019 for broad discussions of monetary integration/fragmentation and related literature). This may be seen in Determine 1, which reveals two combination indicators of monetary integration – one primarily based on cross-border worth differentials in key monetary markets (price-based composite indicator, the blue line) and one other primarily based on cross-border asset holdings (quantity-based composite indicator, the yellow line). For instance, the Nice Monetary Disaster and the European sovereign debt crises collectively introduced measured monetary integration all the way down to ranges much like the occasions of the euro’s introduction. The explanations for these centrifugal forces are multifaceted, however two significantly necessary and interrelated ones are that EMU has been constructed bottom-up from single sovereign international locations the place the unification of financial coverage was not accompanied by a commensurate fiscal union. As member international locations have differing fiscal and financial strengths, they don’t have the identical means to stabilise throughout crises. 

Determine 1 Low-frequency price-based and quantity-based composite indicators of euro space monetary integration

(quarterly information, price-based indicator: Q1 1995 – Q1 2022, quantity-based indicator: Q1 1999 – Q1 2022)

Sources: ECB and ECB calculations
Notes: The worth-based composite indicator aggregates ten indicators for cash, bond, fairness and retail banking markets, measuring cross-border asset worth or yield convergence, whereas the quantity-based composite indicator aggregates 5 indicators for a similar market segments (besides retail banking), measuring cross-border asset holdings. The quarterly values of the price-based composite indicator are computed as the common of the month-to-month values of the respective quarter whereas the values of the quantity-based composite indicator seek advice from the tip of the respective quarter. The symptoms are bounded between zero (full fragmentation) and one (full integration). Will increase within the indicators sign larger monetary integration, i.e. larger cross-border asset worth or yield convergence and larger cross-border asset funding inside the euro space, respectively. From January 2018 onwards the behaviour of the price-based indicator might have modified because of the transition from EONIA to €STR rates of interest within the cash market part. Detailed descriptions of each indicators and their enter information are within the Statistical Internet Annex of ECB (2022) and Hoffmann et al. (2019). OMT stands for Outright Financial Transactions. 

As a consequence of every disaster, new institutional preparations and coverage instruments have been launched within the fiscal, financial, prudential, and structural coverage areas (see Hartmann and Smets 2018, Rancoita et al. 2020, Tordoir et al. 2020, Afman et al. 2021, Buti 2021, Freier et al. 2022, ECB 2022b, 2022c, in addition to ESRB 2022 for broad overviews). They implied steps in direction of the completion of EMU and monetary integration recovered, although extra in costs than in portions (see the right-hand facet of Determine 1). When the COVID-19 disaster hit (penultimate pink vertical line to the correct), a pointy re-fragmentation set in once more. Nevertheless it turned out to be much less extreme and extra short-lived than the earlier episodes, notably as highly effective improvements in coverage had been made once more (e.g. Hartmann et al. 2021, ECB 2022a). 

A ‘scientific’ evaluation of euro space monetary integration in the course of the early part of the Ukraine conflict

From the acute proper of Determine 1, the influence of the Ukraine disaster on euro space monetary integration appears comparatively contained as effectively (with quarterly information). Determine 2 gives an in depth image of euro space monetary integration developments with day by day information (blue line) and related occasions (vertical strains with capital letters) in the course of the first three months of the conflict. (This high-frequency indicator is barely out there for worth information.) 

Determine 2 Excessive-frequency price-based composite indicator of euro space monetary integration and related occasions in the course of the Ukraine disaster

(day by day information, 10 January 2022 – 23 Could 2022)

Sources: ECB and ECB calculations
Notes: The high-frequency price-based composite indicator of monetary integration is a variant of the low-frequency price-based indicator developed by Hoffmann et al. (2019), as proven in Determine 1, at day by day frequency somewhat than month-to-month or quarterly frequency. Whereas protecting the identical market segments its give attention to high-frequency information implies that it may well incorporate solely a decrease variety of indicators general. Its development is described in Kochanska, Mulder and Zito (2020). Black vertical strains with capital letters mark chosen related occasions:
A. U.S. and Russia accuse one another at U.N. Safety Council assembly of stoking Ukraine disaster (31 January 2022); B. Russia and Belarus begin massive army drills near the Ukrainian border (10 February 2022); C. Russian army pronounces pulling again some troops near Ukraine (15 February 2022), D. Combating escalates in separatist areas of jap Ukraine (17 February 2022); E. U.S. President Biden and Secretary of State warn that Russia could also be on the brink of invading Ukraine (17 February 2022); F. Russian invasion of Ukraine and settlement of EU leaders on a second sanctions package deal in opposition to Russia (24 February 2022); G. European international locations (third package deal) and U.S. agree on additional sanctions, together with exclusion of some Russian banks from SWIFT and blocking the Russian central financial institution from entry to its international reserves (26 February 2022); H. European Union stated to contemplate joint bond gross sales to finance larger power and defence spending rising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in addition to US and UK ban on Russian oil imports (8 March 2022); I. ECB accelerates discount in web asset purchases in opposition to the background of continued excessive inflation and Ukraine not any longer urgent for NATO membership in addition to signalling openness to neutrality with safety ensures (10 March 2022); J. Russia and Ukraine trace at progress in peace negotiations (16 March 2022); Okay. EU leaders announce that they may collectively purchase fuel, liquefied pure fuel and hydrogen this 12 months (21 March 2022); L. President Putin’s decree demanding international consumers to pay for Russian fuel in roubles or have their provides lower (1 April 2022); M. Euro space financial sentiment reaches an sudden one-year low, German Finance Minister opens as much as an oil embargo in opposition to Russia and euro space sovereign yields/spreads edge up within the run-up of US Fed and Financial institution of England financial coverage conferences (2 Could 2022); N. Following a Financial institution of England charge improve and announcement to begin (as the primary main central financial institution) actively promoting company bonds in September, following a number of ECB Governing Council Members’ feedback on the ECB’s future path of charges and following sizeable falls in German industrial manufacturing and manufacturing facility orders, the Italian sovereign unfold and company credit score threat in Europe attain two-year highs (5 Could 2022).

First, the time at which integration started to be affected could possibly be dated to end-January 2022, when a stand-off between Russia and the US occurred within the United Nations safety council as as to if Russia deliberate to assault Ukraine (occasion A in Determine 2), or on the primary day of the invasion when EU leaders additionally agreed on a second package deal of sanctions in opposition to Russia (24 February 2022; occasion F). Second, proper after the invasion and the primary sanctions the price-based indicator indicators sharp fragmentation, though not significantly massive in comparison with the earlier episodes proven in Determine 1. Third, after a sequence of stories a few comparatively united European response to the disaster and about indicators of a moderation of the battle (occasions H, I, J, and Okay in Determine 2), greater than half of the preliminary fragmentation reversed (see additionally De Guindos 2022). Fourth, this re-integration development stopped with President Putin’s decree requiring international consumers to pay for Russian fuel in roubles (occasion L; see additionally Zagrandi et al. 2022). After that (till the tip of our information interval on 23 Could 2022), measured monetary integration throughout euro space international locations hovered under the pre-crisis degree however above the trough in the course of the days following the invasion.

It’s fascinating to see that occasions pointing to a worsening of the battle (public arguments of politicians, army escalations or sanctions/retaliation; e.g. occasions A, B, D, E, F, G, H, L and M) appear to drive the euro space integration indicator down, whereas moderation of the battle (peace talks, softening of negotiation positions or army de-escalation; e.g. occasions C, I and J) and unified European approaches to take care of the financial penalties (potential joint debt issuance or joint power purchases; occasions H and Okay) appear to drive it up once more. 

Determine 3 Excessive-frequency comparability of price-based monetary fragmentation within the euro space earlier than and after the start of the Ukraine and COVID crises

(day by day information, brown strong line: 13 January – 25 April 2022, brown dashed line: 20 December 2021 – 28 March 2022, blue line: 10 January – 21 April 2020)

Sources: ECB and ECB calculations
Notes: The high-frequency price-based composite indicator is described within the notes to Determine 2. On the horizontal axis 0 is the day of the start of the disaster, with unfavorable numbers indicating days earlier than and optimistic numbers days after it. The start of the COVID disaster is dated 21 February 2020 (blue line). For the Ukraine disaster two different beginning dates are displayed, 31 January 2022 (dashed brown line) and 24 February 2022 (strong brown line). 

Determine 3 compares the preliminary fragmentation at first of the COVID disaster with the preliminary fragmentation at first of the Ukraine disaster. Regardless of whether or not one dates the latter to the time of the escalation within the ‘disagreement’ or the time of the efficient invasion, its monetary integration implications for the euro space remained clearly extra contained than for the COVID disaster. In sum, whereas one needs to be cautious that the Nice Monetary Disaster, the European sovereign debt disaster, the COVID disaster, and now the Ukraine disaster are of very completely different nature and magnitude, our integration measures counsel that the reforms making steps in direction of EMU completion and the adoption of recent coverage instruments by varied authorities have been growing resilience of euro space monetary integration over time. 

An exploratory evaluation of additional components accounting for monetary fragmentation in the course of the Ukraine disaster

Cross-country asset worth or yield differentials, as captured within the earlier three figures (varied blue and brown strains for the price-based indicators), will be defined by variations within the financial fundamentals that affect the valuation of belongings, variations in market expectations in regards to the future growth of fundamentals and related threat premiums or non-fundamental market dynamics/mispricing (e.g. from the dissemination of inaccurate info, herding behaviour, self-fulfilling expectations, market panics or illiquidity). The next figures illustrate a few of the components that appear to have pushed the divergence of asset costs throughout euro space international locations in the course of the first three months of the Ukraine disaster. All relate to asset costs included in or affecting the price-based indicator of monetary integration displayed in Figures 1, 2 and three. 

One of many main components how the Ukraine conflict influences different international locations is thru power imports (e.g. Verwey et al. 2022). Notably European international locations import a variety of fuel and oil from Russia, albeit to differing levels. When Russia restricted deliveries in response to sanctions, costs skyrocketed. This accelerated inflation, constrained progress, and triggered fiscal expenditures to include the influence on corporations and households in euro space international locations. International locations with larger power dependence on Russia had been affected greater than international locations who use different power sources. 

Determine 4 illustrates whether or not differing power imports from Russia had been mirrored in euro space international locations’ sovereign spreads throughout the principle monetary fragmentation interval firstly of the conflict (23 February to 1 March 2022; recall the sharp decline in Determine 2 throughout this era). Two channels by which this could possibly be the case is thru larger public expenditures (as talked about above) and decrease tax revenues from decrease progress, each of which might improve fiscal deficits and thereby are likely to decrease the creditworthiness of nations. 

There appears to be one group of nations with low power publicity to Russia (blue dots in Determine 4) for which no clear relationship is seen. However for the most-exposed international locations (above a degree of 1% of whole non-euro space imports; pink dots), larger dependence tended to indicate a larger improve of their sovereign unfold in opposition to Germany (additionally illustrated by a dotted pink regression-fitted line for these international locations). Curiously, within the subsequent interval of re-integration (see the rise of the price-based integration indicator in Determine 2 from occasion H to occasion L) the connection flips signal, which means that the extremely uncovered international locations benefited from bigger unfold declines in comparison with the less-exposed international locations (not proven in Determine 4). (Related relationships maintain for sovereign yields somewhat than spreads, the place Germany is within the blue group of nations.) Clearly, given the low variety of observations, all these correlations must be interpreted cautiously.

Determine 4 Euro space international locations’ power dependence from Russia and their sovereign spreads in the course of the preliminary fragmentation interval at first of the Ukraine conflict

(vertical axis: change between 23 February and 1 March 2022 in foundation factors; horizontal axis: 2021)

Sources: Refinitiv, Eurostat and ECB calculations
Notes: Sovereign spreads are for 10-year authorities bond yields relative to Germany. International locations with power publicity to Russia under 1 per cent are marked in blue and international locations above 1 per cent in pink. Dotted strains are fitted with easy bivariate regressions together with an intercept. The black dotted line incorporates all 15 euro space international locations for which dependable information had been out there (blue and pink dots). The pink dotted line solely incorporates the international locations with the biggest power exposures to Russia. Nation abbreviations are as follows: AT=Austria; BE=Belgium; CY=Cyprus; ES=Spain; GR=Greece; FI=Finland; FR=France; IE=Eire; IT=Italy; LT=Lithuania; MT=Malta; NL=Netherlands; PT=Portugal; SI=Slovenia; SK=Slovakia.

One would anticipate that additionally euro space corporations or company sectors can be affected in differential methods, relying on their relative reliance on oil and fuel. Completely different industrial buildings – with some international locations having a larger share of energy-dependent sectors than others – might then indicate the divergence of fairness or company bond markets throughout inner euro space borders. Determine 5 shows the evolution of euro space inventory market indices for 2 significantly energy- or oil-dependent company sectors – transport (gray line) and chemical substances (violet line) – in comparison with a normal market index (dashed black line). As one would anticipate, the transport index underperforms relative to the general market in the course of the preliminary fragmentation interval (23 February to 1 March 2022; gentle orange shaded space) and overperforms relative to the market in the course of the short-term re-integration interval (7 March to 1 April 2022; gentle inexperienced shaded space). However the chemical substances sector index behaves hardly completely different from the general market index, besides maybe for the final week of the re-integration interval. Even for the transport index, deviations from the final market index don’t appear to be persistently massive. 

Extra usually, with the info out there to us we couldn’t discover systematic outcomes for the connection between fairness market returns and power dependence, neither in cross-country correlations, nor in cross-sector correlations. Three issues might clarify this considerably shocking outcome. First, inventory market indices for company sectors is probably not sufficiently granular, typically mixing corporations with excessive and low power or oil consumption. Second, some energy-intensive corporations or sectors might profit from market buildings during which they’ve pricing energy. This market energy would enable corporations to go the upper enter prices on to their prospects with out decreased income materialising of their fairness market valuations. Third, the final macroeconomic implications of the Ukraine disaster for the euro space (decrease progress and better inflation) might dominate sector-specific implications, in order that fairness buyers don’t discriminate as a lot between sectors as one may need anticipated. Consistent with these issues, if one decomposes the price-based composite indicator of monetary integration in Determine 2 into its market elements (not proven within the figures of this column), then its adjustments in the course of the Ukraine disaster are significantly pushed by bond markets and solely to a restricted extent by fairness markets.

Determine 5 Euro space inventory market indices in the course of the starting of the Ukraine conflict

(vertical axis: all indices normalised to 100 on 23 February 2022 and sector indices re-normalised to the extent of the general market index on 7 March 2022; horizontal axis: day by day information from 22 February to 1 April 2022)

Sources: Bloomberg and ECB calculations 
Notes: General market index is the Morgan Stanley Capital Worldwide (MSCI) Europe Index. Transport sector index is the MSCI Europe Transportation Index. Chemical compounds sector index is the STOXX Europe Chemical compounds Index.

Allow us to now flip from power to monetary exposures. Determine 6, which is constructed in an identical manner as Determine 4, illustrates whether or not euro space banks’ exposures to Russia and Ukraine had been mirrored of their bond yields. Right here we don’t take a look at the fragmentation interval in the course of the first days of the conflict however on the short-term re-integration interval (7 March to 1 April 2022). Due to this fact, the speculation reverses: as some indicators of a rest of the battle emerge and as European international locations reply in a unified manner, do the banks with the biggest exposures to Russia and Ukraine expertise a larger discount of their bond yields in comparison with much less uncovered banks, as threat premiums decline? 

The primary statement from Determine 6 is that euro space banks’ direct exposures are general fairly low (see additionally ECB 2022d). Whereas with restricted country-level information the connection is unavoidably weak and the correlations need to be interpreted with warning, the pink dotted line is broadly in keeping with the speculation. Observe that a number of international locations (dots) needed to be faraway from the determine for confidentiality causes, however their information are included within the regression-fitted strains. Furthermore, the corresponding determine for the fragmentation interval reveals related outcomes (not displayed in Determine 6), simply with optimistic slopes of the fitted strains (as one would anticipate and likewise in keeping with Determine 4). 

Determine 6 Euro space international locations’ financial institution exposures to Russia and Ukraine and their bond yields in the course of the short-term re-integration interval in the course of the Ukraine conflict

(vertical axis: change between 7 March and 1 April 2022 in foundation factors; horizontal axis: This fall 2021)

Sources: Bloomberg, ECB and ECB calculations
Notes: Financial institution exposures are to households, non-financial companies and authorities establishments, protecting money deposits, debt, loans, securities and derivatives holdings. International locations with financial institution exposures under 0.25% are marked in blue and international locations above this worth in pink. Dotted strains are fitted with easy bivariate regressions together with an intercept. The black dotted regression-line incorporates all 11 euro space international locations for which dependable information had been out there (blue and pink dots). The pink dotted line solely incorporates the international locations with the biggest financial institution exposures to Russia and Ukraine. The dots of three international locations needed to be suppressed for information confidentiality causes however their information are included within the regression-fitted strains. Irish information had been a big outlier and subsequently excluded from this determine. Nation abbreviations: DE=Germany; LU=Luxemburg; relaxation see notes to Determine 4.

In sum, the proof to this point means that the course of fragmentation and re-integration traits in the course of the early months of the battle appear to be broadly in keeping with the instructions one would anticipate from some elementary components. However we can not infer from this straightforward evaluation that non-fundamental market dynamics or procyclical threat premiums haven’t performed any function.

Allow us to conclude with a take a look at components that will disturb the accuracy of pricing belongings throughout euro space international locations. Within the the rest of this column, we give attention to financial uncertainty (see additionally Anayi et al. 2022 on the uncertainty results of the Ukraine disaster). If uncertainty in regards to the financial outlook of a rustic will increase (declines), threat premiums will be anticipated to rise (decline) and monetary market expectations might turn into extra (much less) susceptible to herding or extra (much less) susceptible to self-fulfilling equilibriums.

Determine 7 Uncertainty about euro space international locations’ outlook and their sovereign yields in the course of the starting of the Ukraine conflict

(vertical axis: change from February to March 2022 in foundation factors; horizontal axis: change from March to April 2022 in share factors)

Sources: Refinitiv, European Fee and ECB calculations
Notes: Modifications in financial uncertainty are measured with month-to-month variations of the Financial Uncertainty Indicator of the European Fee (2022a, part 3.6.8). This indicator is derived from surveys of customers and firm managers (within the trade, companies, development and retail commerce sectors). Respondents are requested in the course of the first three weeks of a month how troublesome they discover it to foretell their future monetary scenario (for households/customers) or their future enterprise scenario (for corporations/managers). They will select considered one of 5 attainable solutions: straightforward to foretell, reasonably straightforward to foretell, reasonably troublesome to foretell, troublesome to foretell or don’t know. A month-to-month worth of the indicator is the mixture share of respondents that reply troublesome to foretell or reasonably troublesome to foretell. Sovereign yields are for 10-year authorities bonds. To match them with the timing of the Fee survey area work, adjustments are calculated because the distinction between the common day by day yield degree in the course of the first three weeks of a month. Dotted strains are fitted with easy bivariate regressions together with an intercept. The inexperienced dotted line, protecting adjustments from February (earlier than the conflict) to March, incorporates all 16 euro space international locations for which dependable information had been out there (inexperienced dots). The sunshine blue dotted line, protecting adjustments from March to April, incorporates 15 euro space international locations, as Greece needed to be excluded as an excessive outlier. Nation abbreviations are the identical as in Figures 4 and 5. The indicators of the correlations mirrored within the dotted strains don’t change when Malta is faraway from the February-March interval or Slovakia from the March-April interval.

Determine 7 reveals how euro space international locations’ sovereign yields had been correlated with adjustments in uncertainty, as measured with the European Fee’s broad survey-based Financial Uncertainty Indicator (EUI; see European Fee 2022a), in the course of the first months of the conflict. This indicator combines survey solutions of customers and firm managers in numerous EU international locations about how troublesome they discover it to foretell their future monetary or enterprise scenario.

Growing uncertainty in regards to the financial and monetary outlook appears to be related to larger sovereign yields (inexperienced dots and inexperienced dotted regression-fitted line for adjustments from February – earlier than the conflict – to March) and declining uncertainty with decrease sovereign yields (gentle blue dots and light-weight blue fitted line for adjustments from March to April). The identical relationship is discovered for uncertainty and sovereign spreads relative to Germany (not reported in Determine 7). 

In different phrases, whereas additional analysis is required on the relative stability between elementary and non-fundamental components in driving the monetary integration developments in the course of the Ukraine disaster, it appears seemingly that in an setting of fixing financial uncertainty each elements could have performed a task.

Authors’ be aware: All views expressed are these of the authors and shouldn’t be thought to be the views of the ECB or the Eurosystem.

References

Adam, Okay, T Jappelli, A Menichini, M Padula and M Pagano (2002), “Analyse, examine, and apply different indicators and monitoring methodologies to measure the evolution of capital market integration within the European Union”, Report back to the European Fee, 28 January.

Afman, E, S Engels, S Langedijk, P Pfeiffer and Jan in’t Veld (2021), “An outline of the economics of the Restoration and Resilience Facility”, European Fee Quarterly Report on the Euro Space 20(3): 7-16, December.

Anayi, L, N Bloom, P Bunn, P Mizen, G Thwaites, I Yotzov (2020) “The influence of conflict in Ukraine on financial uncertainty”, VoxEU, 16 April.

Baele, L,  A Ferrando, P Hördahl, E Krylova, C Monnet (2004), “Measuring monetary integration within the euro space”, ECB Occasional Paper 14, April.

Borgioli, S, C-W Horn, U Kochanska, P Molitor, F P Mongelli (2020), “European monetary integration in the course of the COVID-19 disaster”, in ECB Financial Bulletin 7, 12 November.

Buti, M (2021), The Man Inside: A European Journey by Two Crises, Milan: Bocconi College Press.

Claessens, S (2019), “Fragmentation in international monetary markets: good or dangerous for monetary stability?”, BIS Working Paper 815, October.

De Guindos, L (2022), “An EU monetary programs for the long run”, Keynote speech on the joint European Central Financial institution/European Fee convention on “European Monetary Integration”, 6 April.

European Central Financial institution (2007), Monetary integration in Europe, Frankfurt am Foremost, March.

European Central Financial institution (2022a), Monetary integration and construction within the euro space, Frankfurt am Foremost, April (together with a web-based annex).

European Central Financial institution (2022b), “Our response to the coronavirus pandemic”, ECB web site, retrieved 9 June.

European Central Financial institution (2022c), “FAQs on ECB supervisory measures in response to the coronavirus”, ECB Banking Supervision web site, retrieved 10 June.

European Central Financial institution (2022d), Monetary stability assessment, Could.

European Fee (2022a), The joint harmonised EU programme of enterprise and client surveys: person information, Brussels, up to date Could.

European Fee (2022b), “Sanctions adopted following Russia’s army aggression in opposition to Ukraine”, Fee web site, retrieved 10 June.

European Parliament (ed., 2016), Monetary market fragmentation within the euro space: state of play, Financial Dialogue, September.

European Systemic Threat Board (2022), “Coverage measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic”, ESRB web site, retrieved 10 June.

Monetary Stability Board (2019), FSB report on market fragmentation, delivered for the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Financial institution Governors assembly in Fukuoka, 4 June.

Freier, M, C Grynberg, M O’Connell, M Rodríguez-Vives and N Zorell (2022), “Subsequent Technology EU: a euro space perspective”, ECB Financial Bulletin 1, 17 February.

Hartmann, P, and F Smets (2018), “The European Central Financial institution’s financial coverage throughout its first 20 years”, Brookings Papers on Financial Exercise fall: 1-118.

Hartmann, P, S Borgioli, A Kempf, P Molitor and FP Mongelli (2021), “Monetary integration and construction in EMU in the course of the corona disaster”, VoxEU, 28 Could.

Hoffmann, P, M Kremer and S Zaharia (2019), “Monetary integration in Europe by the lens of composite indicators”, ECB Working Paper 2319, September.

Kochanska, U, E Mulder and A Zito (2020), “Excessive-frequency monetary integration indicators inside a real-time monitoring toolkit”, ECB Financial Bulletin 7, Field 1 of “European monetary integration in the course of the COVID-19 disaster”, 12 November.

Krobath, M, and J Wtorek (2019), “Institutional reforms”, European Fee Quarterly Report on the Euro Space 18(2): 57-71, November.

Rancoita, E, M Grodzicki, H Hempell, C Kok, J Metzler and A Prapiestis (2020), “Monetary stability issues arising from the interplay of coronavirus-related coverage measures”, ECB Monetary Stability Evaluate, November.

Tordoir, S, J Carmassi, S Hauptmeier and M Jahning (2020), “The state of play concerning the deepening agenda for Financial and Financial Union”, ECB Financial Bulletin 2, 26 March.

Verwey, M, L Bardone and Okay Orsini (2022), “Russian invasion exams EU financial resilience”, VoxEU, 20 Could.

Zagrandi, M S (2022), “Ruble funds: shielding the Ruble from monetary sanctions”, VoxEU, 25 July.